SLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Schrodinger has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Simulations Plus's net margin of -45.54%. Simulations Plus's return on equity of 4.58% beat Schrodinger's return on equity of -38.87%.

Simulations Plus has a consensus price target of $49.40, signalling upside risk potential of 93.31%. On the other hand Schrodinger has an analysts' consensus of $32.09 which suggests that it could grow by 47.21%. Given that Simulations Plus has higher upside potential than Schrodinger, analysts believe Simulations Plus is more attractive than Schrodinger.

Simulations Plus has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schrodinger has a beta of 1.624, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.426%.

Simulations Plus has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Schrodinger offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Simulations Plus pays 48.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Schrodinger pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simulations Plus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Simulations Plus quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Schrodinger quarterly revenues of $88.3M. Simulations Plus's net income of $206K is higher than Schrodinger's net income of -$40.2M. Notably, Simulations Plus's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.89x while Schrodinger's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simulations Plus is 6.97x versus 7.63x for Schrodinger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veeva Systems has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Simulations Plus's net margin of 27.14%. Simulations Plus's return on equity of 4.58% beat Veeva Systems's return on equity of 13.71%.

Simulations Plus has a consensus price target of $49.40, signalling upside risk potential of 93.31%. On the other hand Veeva Systems has an analysts' consensus of $266.49 which suggests that it could grow by 12.55%. Given that Simulations Plus has higher upside potential than Veeva Systems, analysts believe Simulations Plus is more attractive than Veeva Systems.

Simulations Plus has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veeva Systems has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.727%.

Simulations Plus has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Veeva Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Simulations Plus pays 48.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Veeva Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simulations Plus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Simulations Plus quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Veeva Systems quarterly revenues of $720.9M. Simulations Plus's net income of $206K is lower than Veeva Systems's net income of $195.6M. Notably, Simulations Plus's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.89x while Veeva Systems's PE ratio is 54.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simulations Plus is 6.97x versus 14.22x for Veeva Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Mobile Healthcare has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Simulations Plus's net margin of --. Simulations Plus's return on equity of 4.58% beat Nano Mobile Healthcare's return on equity of --.

Simulations Plus has a consensus price target of $49.40, signalling upside risk potential of 93.31%. On the other hand Nano Mobile Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Simulations Plus has higher upside potential than Nano Mobile Healthcare, analysts believe Simulations Plus is more attractive than Nano Mobile Healthcare.

Simulations Plus has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Mobile Healthcare has a beta of -0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.377%.

Simulations Plus has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Nano Mobile Healthcare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Simulations Plus pays 48.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Mobile Healthcare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simulations Plus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Simulations Plus quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are larger than Nano Mobile Healthcare quarterly revenues of --. Simulations Plus's net income of $206K is higher than Nano Mobile Healthcare's net income of --. Notably, Simulations Plus's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.89x while Nano Mobile Healthcare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simulations Plus is 6.97x versus -- for Nano Mobile Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xsovt Brands has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Simulations Plus's net margin of --. Simulations Plus's return on equity of 4.58% beat Xsovt Brands's return on equity of --.

Simulations Plus has a consensus price target of $49.40, signalling upside risk potential of 93.31%. On the other hand Xsovt Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Simulations Plus has higher upside potential than Xsovt Brands, analysts believe Simulations Plus is more attractive than Xsovt Brands.

Simulations Plus has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xsovt Brands has a beta of 5.709, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 470.861%.

Simulations Plus has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Xsovt Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Simulations Plus pays 48.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Xsovt Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simulations Plus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Simulations Plus quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are larger than Xsovt Brands quarterly revenues of --. Simulations Plus's net income of $206K is higher than Xsovt Brands's net income of --. Notably, Simulations Plus's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.89x while Xsovt Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simulations Plus is 6.97x versus -- for Xsovt Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.