STRR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delcath Systems has a net margin of -14.42% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of -22.5%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13% beat Delcath Systems's return on equity of -117.89%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 365.12%. On the other hand Delcath Systems has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 86.26%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Delcath Systems, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Delcath Systems.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.075, which suggesting that the stock is 92.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delcath Systems has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.957%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Delcath Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Delcath Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Delcath Systems quarterly revenues of $15.1M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M is higher than Delcath Systems's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.75x while Delcath Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.14x versus 9.55x for Delcath Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exact Sciences has a net margin of -14.42% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of -121.19%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13% beat Exact Sciences's return on equity of -34.11%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 365.12%. On the other hand Exact Sciences has an analysts' consensus of $69.43 which suggests that it could grow by 61.31%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Exact Sciences, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Exact Sciences.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.075, which suggesting that the stock is 92.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exact Sciences has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.844%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exact Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Exact Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Exact Sciences quarterly revenues of $713.4M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M is higher than Exact Sciences's net income of -$864.6M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.75x while Exact Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.14x versus 2.87x for Exact Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Illumina has a net margin of -14.42% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of 16.94%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13% beat Illumina's return on equity of -35.09%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 365.12%. On the other hand Illumina has an analysts' consensus of $132.64 which suggests that it could grow by 57.82%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Illumina, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Illumina.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.075, which suggesting that the stock is 92.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Illumina has a beta of 1.171, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.134%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Illumina offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Illumina pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Illumina quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M is lower than Illumina's net income of $187M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.75x while Illumina's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.14x versus 3.06x for Illumina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natera has a net margin of -14.42% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of -11.3%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13% beat Natera's return on equity of -21.3%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 365.12%. On the other hand Natera has an analysts' consensus of $188.18 which suggests that it could grow by 32.05%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Natera, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Natera.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.075, which suggesting that the stock is 92.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natera has a beta of 1.804, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.383%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natera offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Natera pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Natera quarterly revenues of $476.1M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M is higher than Natera's net income of -$53.8M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.75x while Natera's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.14x versus 10.47x for Natera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.