SYNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -8.96% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -24.46%. Synaptics's return on equity of 11.99% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -49.92%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.61%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $90.38 which suggests that it could grow by 8.6%. Given that Synaptics has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Synaptics is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.449, which suggesting that the stock is 44.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.414%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $257.7M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $336.9M. Synaptics's net income of -$23.1M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$82.4M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.71x while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 3.18x versus 4.09x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of -8.96% compared to Synaptics's net margin of 28.51%. Synaptics's return on equity of 11.99% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.24%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.61%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that Qualcomm has higher upside potential than Synaptics, analysts believe Qualcomm is more attractive than Synaptics.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.449, which suggesting that the stock is 44.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.479%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $257.7M, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $10.2B. Synaptics's net income of -$23.1M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.71x while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 17.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 3.18x versus 4.59x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of -8.96% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -868.86%. Synaptics's return on equity of 11.99% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.61%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.39%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Synaptics, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Synaptics.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.449, which suggesting that the stock is 44.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.291%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $257.7M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Synaptics's net income of -$23.1M is lower than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.71x while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 3.18x versus 46.99x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -8.96% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -19.01%. Synaptics's return on equity of 11.99% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -10.81%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.61%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.43%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Synaptics, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Synaptics.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.449, which suggesting that the stock is 44.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.237%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $257.7M, which are larger than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $140M. Synaptics's net income of -$23.1M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$26.6M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.71x while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 3.18x versus 1.13x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.