TRMK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

F N B has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 29.49%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.17% beat F N B's return on equity of 7.57%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.20, signalling upside risk potential of 31.97%. On the other hand F N B has an analysts' consensus of $17.69 which suggests that it could grow by 50.02%. Given that F N B has higher upside potential than Trustmark, analysts believe F N B is more attractive than Trustmark.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F N B has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.211%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. F N B offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. F N B pays out 38.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $169.2M, which are smaller than F N B quarterly revenues of $373M. Trustmark's net income of $56.3M is lower than F N B's net income of $110M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.58x while F N B's PE ratio is 9.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.07x versus 2.68x for F N B. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hanmi Financial has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 29.1%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.17% beat Hanmi Financial's return on equity of 8.69%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.20, signalling upside risk potential of 31.97%. On the other hand Hanmi Financial has an analysts' consensus of $26.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.58%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Hanmi Financial, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Hanmi Financial.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanmi Financial has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.105%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. Hanmi Financial offers a yield of 4.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanmi Financial pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $169.2M, which are larger than Hanmi Financial quarterly revenues of $60.8M. Trustmark's net income of $56.3M is higher than Hanmi Financial's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.58x while Hanmi Financial's PE ratio is 9.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.07x versus 2.63x for Hanmi Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 25.65%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.17% beat Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida's return on equity of 5.64%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.20, signalling upside risk potential of 31.97%. On the other hand Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida has an analysts' consensus of $29.67 which suggests that it could grow by 34.6%. Given that Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida has higher upside potential than Trustmark, analysts believe Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida is more attractive than Trustmark.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.49%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida pays out 50.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $169.2M, which are larger than Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida quarterly revenues of $132.9M. Trustmark's net income of $56.3M is higher than Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida's net income of $34.1M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.58x while Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida's PE ratio is 15.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.07x versus 3.64x for Seacoast Banking Corp of Florida. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 24.38%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.17% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 5.5%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.20, signalling upside risk potential of 31.97%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $10.80 which suggests that it could grow by 37.23%. Given that Valley National Bancorp has higher upside potential than Trustmark, analysts believe Valley National Bancorp is more attractive than Trustmark.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.268%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 5.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 65.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $169.2M, which are smaller than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $474.6M. Trustmark's net income of $56.3M is lower than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $115.7M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.58x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.07x versus 2.21x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.