TROO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Engine Group Holding has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat Global Engine Group Holding's return on equity of --.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Engine Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS has higher upside potential than Global Engine Group Holding, analysts believe TROOPS is more attractive than Global Engine Group Holding.

TROOPS has a beta of 1.641, which suggesting that the stock is 64.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Engine Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Engine Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Engine Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Engine Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than Global Engine Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Engine Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 42.33x versus -- for Global Engine Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Infobird has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat Infobird's return on equity of 2.83%.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Infobird has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2277525.57%. Given that Infobird has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Infobird is more attractive than TROOPS.

TROOPS has a beta of 1.641, which suggesting that the stock is 64.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Infobird has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Infobird offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Infobird pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Infobird quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than Infobird's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Infobird's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 42.33x versus 4.91x for Infobird. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triller has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat Triller's return on equity of --.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Triller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS has higher upside potential than Triller, analysts believe TROOPS is more attractive than Triller.

TROOPS has a beta of 1.641, which suggesting that the stock is 64.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triller has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triller offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Triller quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than Triller's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Triller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 42.33x versus -- for Triller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MMTEC has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat MMTEC's return on equity of --.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MMTEC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS has higher upside potential than MMTEC, analysts believe TROOPS is more attractive than MMTEC.

TROOPS has a beta of 1.641, which suggesting that the stock is 64.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MMTEC has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.041%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MMTEC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MMTEC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MMTEC quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than MMTEC's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MMTEC's PE ratio is 1.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 42.33x versus 35.75x for MMTEC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.