UK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Country Garden Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Ucommune International's net margin of --. Ucommune International's return on equity of -36.07% beat Country Garden Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ucommune International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Country Garden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ucommune International has higher upside potential than Country Garden Holdings, analysts believe Ucommune International is more attractive than Country Garden Holdings.

Ucommune International has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Country Garden Holdings has a beta of 0.248, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.236%.

Ucommune International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Country Garden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ucommune International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Country Garden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ucommune International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Country Garden Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Ucommune International's net income of -- is lower than Country Garden Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Ucommune International's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.61x while Country Garden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ucommune International is 0.00x versus 0.00x for Country Garden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fangdd Network Group has a net margin of -- compared to Ucommune International's net margin of --. Ucommune International's return on equity of -36.07% beat Fangdd Network Group's return on equity of --.

Ucommune International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fangdd Network Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ucommune International has higher upside potential than Fangdd Network Group, analysts believe Ucommune International is more attractive than Fangdd Network Group.

Ucommune International has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fangdd Network Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ucommune International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fangdd Network Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ucommune International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fangdd Network Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ucommune International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fangdd Network Group quarterly revenues of --. Ucommune International's net income of -- is lower than Fangdd Network Group's net income of --. Notably, Ucommune International's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.61x while Fangdd Network Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ucommune International is 0.00x versus -- for Fangdd Network Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wetouch Technology has a net margin of -- compared to Ucommune International's net margin of 23.06%. Ucommune International's return on equity of -36.07% beat Wetouch Technology's return on equity of 3.23%.

Ucommune International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wetouch Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ucommune International has higher upside potential than Wetouch Technology, analysts believe Ucommune International is more attractive than Wetouch Technology.

Ucommune International has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wetouch Technology has a beta of -0.302, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.174%.

Ucommune International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wetouch Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ucommune International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wetouch Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ucommune International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wetouch Technology quarterly revenues of $11.5M. Ucommune International's net income of -- is lower than Wetouch Technology's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Ucommune International's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.61x while Wetouch Technology's PE ratio is 5.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ucommune International is 0.00x versus 0.36x for Wetouch Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xinyuan Real Estate has a net margin of -- compared to Ucommune International's net margin of --. Ucommune International's return on equity of -36.07% beat Xinyuan Real Estate's return on equity of --.

Ucommune International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xinyuan Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2804.67%. Given that Xinyuan Real Estate has higher upside potential than Ucommune International, analysts believe Xinyuan Real Estate is more attractive than Ucommune International.

Ucommune International has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xinyuan Real Estate has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.702%.

Ucommune International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xinyuan Real Estate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ucommune International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xinyuan Real Estate pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ucommune International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xinyuan Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. Ucommune International's net income of -- is lower than Xinyuan Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, Ucommune International's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.61x while Xinyuan Real Estate's PE ratio is 0.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ucommune International is 0.00x versus 0.01x for Xinyuan Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.