UMBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commerce Bancshares has a net margin of 30.13% compared to UMB Financial's net margin of 32.45%. UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39% beat Commerce Bancshares's return on equity of 16.5%.

UMB Financial has a consensus price target of $138.89, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Commerce Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $69.55 which suggests that it could grow by 10.38%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Commerce Bancshares, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Commerce Bancshares.

UMB Financial has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commerce Bancshares has a beta of 0.770, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.044%.

UMB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Commerce Bancshares offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. UMB Financial pays 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Commerce Bancshares pays out 28.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMB Financial quarterly revenues are $363.9M, which are smaller than Commerce Bancshares quarterly revenues of $425.2M. UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M is lower than Commerce Bancshares's net income of $138M. Notably, UMB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.33x while Commerce Bancshares's PE ratio is 17.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMB Financial is 3.99x versus 5.19x for Commerce Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fulton Financial has a net margin of 30.13% compared to UMB Financial's net margin of 19.47%. UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39% beat Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

UMB Financial has a consensus price target of $138.89, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Fulton Financial has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 16.38%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Fulton Financial, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Fulton Financial.

UMB Financial has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.555%.

UMB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Fulton Financial offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. UMB Financial pays 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Fulton Financial pays out 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMB Financial quarterly revenues are $363.9M, which are larger than Fulton Financial quarterly revenues of $324.6M. UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M is higher than Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M. Notably, UMB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.33x while Fulton Financial's PE ratio is 12.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMB Financial is 3.99x versus 3.01x for Fulton Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heartland Financial USA has a net margin of 30.13% compared to UMB Financial's net margin of 31.56%. UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39% beat Heartland Financial USA's return on equity of 4.3%.

UMB Financial has a consensus price target of $138.89, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Heartland Financial USA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.16%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Heartland Financial USA, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Heartland Financial USA.

UMB Financial has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heartland Financial USA has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.876%.

UMB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Heartland Financial USA offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. UMB Financial pays 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Financial USA pays out 74.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMB Financial quarterly revenues are $363.9M, which are larger than Heartland Financial USA quarterly revenues of $203.3M. UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M is higher than Heartland Financial USA's net income of $64.2M. Notably, UMB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.33x while Heartland Financial USA's PE ratio is 34.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMB Financial is 3.99x versus 4.44x for Heartland Financial USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zions Bancorp NA has a net margin of 30.13% compared to UMB Financial's net margin of 27.02%. UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39% beat Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 11.87%.

UMB Financial has a consensus price target of $138.89, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Zions Bancorp NA has an analysts' consensus of $60.10 which suggests that it could grow by 11.94%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Zions Bancorp NA, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Zions Bancorp NA.

UMB Financial has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.227%.

UMB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Zions Bancorp NA offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. UMB Financial pays 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorp NA pays out 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMB Financial quarterly revenues are $363.9M, which are smaller than Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues of $792M. UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M is lower than Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $214M. Notably, UMB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.33x while Zions Bancorp NA's PE ratio is 12.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMB Financial is 3.99x versus 2.61x for Zions Bancorp NA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.