VITL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AquaBounty Technologies has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Vital Farms's net margin of -7120.24%. Vital Farms's return on equity of 23.14% beat AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84%.

Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $43.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand AquaBounty Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 90.84%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Vital Farms, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Vital Farms.

Vital Farms has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.186%.

Vital Farms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AquaBounty Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vital Farms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AquaBounty Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vital Farms quarterly revenues are $145M, which are larger than AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues of $47.8K. Vital Farms's net income of $7.4M is higher than AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Vital Farms's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.45x while AquaBounty Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Farms is 3.06x versus 1.61x for AquaBounty Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Vital Farms's net margin of 17.67%. Vital Farms's return on equity of 23.14% beat Cal-Maine Foods's return on equity of 16.61%.

Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $43.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand Cal-Maine Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.42%. Given that Vital Farms has higher upside potential than Cal-Maine Foods, analysts believe Vital Farms is more attractive than Cal-Maine Foods.

Vital Farms has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of -0.102, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.214%.

Vital Farms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cal-Maine Foods offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Vital Farms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 33.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Farms quarterly revenues are $145M, which are smaller than Cal-Maine Foods quarterly revenues of $640.8M. Vital Farms's net income of $7.4M is lower than Cal-Maine Foods's net income of $113.2M. Notably, Vital Farms's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.45x while Cal-Maine Foods's PE ratio is 11.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Farms is 3.06x versus 1.90x for Cal-Maine Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limoneira has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Vital Farms's net margin of 10.42%. Vital Farms's return on equity of 23.14% beat Limoneira's return on equity of 3.04%.

Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $43.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand Limoneira has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -3.57%. Given that Vital Farms has higher upside potential than Limoneira, analysts believe Vital Farms is more attractive than Limoneira.

Vital Farms has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limoneira has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.733%.

Vital Farms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limoneira offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Vital Farms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Farms quarterly revenues are $145M, which are larger than Limoneira quarterly revenues of $63.3M. Vital Farms's net income of $7.4M is higher than Limoneira's net income of $6.6M. Notably, Vital Farms's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.45x while Limoneira's PE ratio is 90.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Farms is 3.06x versus 2.50x for Limoneira. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&W Seed has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Vital Farms's net margin of -195.32%. Vital Farms's return on equity of 23.14% beat S&W Seed's return on equity of -83.77%.

Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $43.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand S&W Seed has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 491.22%. Given that S&W Seed has higher upside potential than Vital Farms, analysts believe S&W Seed is more attractive than Vital Farms.

Vital Farms has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&W Seed has a beta of 1.566, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.58%.

Vital Farms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. S&W Seed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vital Farms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. S&W Seed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vital Farms quarterly revenues are $145M, which are larger than S&W Seed quarterly revenues of $8.3M. Vital Farms's net income of $7.4M is higher than S&W Seed's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, Vital Farms's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.45x while S&W Seed's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Farms is 3.06x versus 0.26x for S&W Seed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.