AMZE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CSG Systems International has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 10.89%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat CSG Systems International's return on equity of 31.31%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CSG Systems International has an analysts' consensus of $74.44 which suggests that it could grow by 28.13%. Given that CSG Systems International has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe CSG Systems International is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSG Systems International has a beta of 0.910, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.009%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CSG Systems International offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CSG Systems International pays out 30.64% of its earnings as a dividend. CSG Systems International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CSG Systems International quarterly revenues of $316.7M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than CSG Systems International's net income of $34.5M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CSG Systems International's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 25.32x versus 1.39x for CSG Systems International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of -26.62%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.27%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 488.969%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 25.32x versus 1.20x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 10.74%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.12%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $87.25 which suggests that it could grow by 25.02%. Given that Cognizant Technology Solutions has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Cognizant Technology Solutions is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.455%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $546M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 15.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 25.32x versus 1.77x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 4.19%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.77%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 12.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 25.32x versus 11.42x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.