COHN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Cohen &'s net margin of 82.11%. Cohen &'s return on equity of 6.72% beat Capital Southwest's return on equity of 9.95%.

Cohen & has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Southwest has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.99%. Given that Capital Southwest has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe Capital Southwest is more attractive than Cohen &.

Cohen & has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.325%.

Cohen & has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.41%. Capital Southwest offers a yield of 11.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Cohen & pays -34.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Southwest pays out 123.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cohen & quarterly revenues are $31.7M, which are larger than Capital Southwest quarterly revenues of $27.6M. Cohen &'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Capital Southwest's net income of $22.7M. Notably, Cohen &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.57x while Capital Southwest's PE ratio is 12.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & is 0.52x versus 9.14x for Capital Southwest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Elm Group has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Cohen &'s net margin of 66.11%. Cohen &'s return on equity of 6.72% beat Great Elm Group's return on equity of -2.14%.

Cohen & has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Great Elm Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & has higher upside potential than Great Elm Group, analysts believe Cohen & is more attractive than Great Elm Group.

Cohen & has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.22799999999999%.

Cohen & has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.41%. Great Elm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cohen & pays -34.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Elm Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cohen & quarterly revenues are $31.7M, which are larger than Great Elm Group quarterly revenues of $4M. Cohen &'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Great Elm Group's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Cohen &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.57x while Great Elm Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & is 0.52x versus 3.21x for Great Elm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PhenixFIN has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Cohen &'s net margin of 71.55%. Cohen &'s return on equity of 6.72% beat PhenixFIN's return on equity of 12.15%.

Cohen & has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PhenixFIN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.1%. Given that PhenixFIN has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe PhenixFIN is more attractive than Cohen &.

Cohen & has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PhenixFIN has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.497%.

Cohen & has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.41%. PhenixFIN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share. Cohen & pays -34.23% of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN pays out 14.21% of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & quarterly revenues are $31.7M, which are larger than PhenixFIN quarterly revenues of $8.5M. Cohen &'s net income of $2.2M is lower than PhenixFIN's net income of $6.1M. Notably, Cohen &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.57x while PhenixFIN's PE ratio is 5.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & is 0.52x versus 3.63x for PhenixFIN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rand Capital has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Cohen &'s net margin of 96.31%. Cohen &'s return on equity of 6.72% beat Rand Capital's return on equity of 19.93%.

Cohen & has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rand Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & has higher upside potential than Rand Capital, analysts believe Cohen & is more attractive than Rand Capital.

Cohen & has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rand Capital has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.336%.

Cohen & has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.41%. Rand Capital offers a yield of 9.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Cohen & pays -34.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital pays out 52.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & quarterly revenues are $31.7M, which are larger than Rand Capital quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Cohen &'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Rand Capital's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Cohen &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.57x while Rand Capital's PE ratio is 3.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & is 0.52x versus 3.09x for Rand Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.