NCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Purple Innovation has a net margin of -- compared to Northann's net margin of -6.57%. Northann's return on equity of -- beat Purple Innovation's return on equity of -165.32%.

Northann has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purple Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 116.7%. Given that Purple Innovation has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Purple Innovation is more attractive than Northann.

Northann has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purple Innovation has a beta of 2.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.868%.

Northann has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Purple Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northann pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purple Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Northann quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purple Innovation quarterly revenues of $129M. Northann's net income of -- is lower than Purple Innovation's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Northann's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purple Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northann is 0.37x versus 0.19x for Purple Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Suncliff has a net margin of -- compared to Northann's net margin of --. Northann's return on equity of -- beat Suncliff's return on equity of --.

Northann has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Suncliff has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northann has higher upside potential than Suncliff, analysts believe Northann is more attractive than Suncliff.

Northann has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Suncliff has a beta of 52.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5163.729%.

Northann has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Suncliff offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northann pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Suncliff pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Northann quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Suncliff quarterly revenues of --. Northann's net income of -- is lower than Suncliff's net income of --. Notably, Northann's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Suncliff's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northann is 0.37x versus 0.85x for Suncliff. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silicon Graphics International Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Northann's net margin of --. Northann's return on equity of -- beat Silicon Graphics International Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Northann has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Silicon Graphics International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northann has higher upside potential than Silicon Graphics International Corp., analysts believe Northann is more attractive than Silicon Graphics International Corp..

Northann has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silicon Graphics International Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Northann has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silicon Graphics International Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northann pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silicon Graphics International Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Northann quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Silicon Graphics International Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Northann's net income of -- is lower than Silicon Graphics International Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Northann's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silicon Graphics International Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northann is 0.37x versus -- for Silicon Graphics International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sleep Number has a net margin of -- compared to Northann's net margin of -1.24%. Northann's return on equity of -- beat Sleep Number's return on equity of --.

Northann has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sleep Number has an analysts' consensus of $11.67 which suggests that it could grow by 59.6%. Given that Sleep Number has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Sleep Number is more attractive than Northann.

Northann has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sleep Number has a beta of 2.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.104%.

Northann has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sleep Number offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northann pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sleep Number pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Northann quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sleep Number quarterly revenues of $376.8M. Northann's net income of -- is lower than Sleep Number's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Northann's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sleep Number's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northann is 0.37x versus 0.10x for Sleep Number. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.