REI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 22.14%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 22.11%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 127.27%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $143.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.16%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than EOG Resources.

Ring Energy has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.639%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $83.4M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.56x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.66x versus 3.01x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 13.06%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 24.2%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 127.27%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $44.21 which suggests that it could grow by 50.47%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

Ring Energy has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.843, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.346%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 5.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $83.4M, which are smaller than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $549.2M. Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $71.7M. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.56x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 5.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.66x versus 1.38x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SandRidge Energy has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 45.12%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21% beat SandRidge Energy's return on equity of 14.19%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 127.27%. On the other hand SandRidge Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.65%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than SandRidge Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than SandRidge Energy.

Ring Energy has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SandRidge Energy has a beta of 2.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.739%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SandRidge Energy offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SandRidge Energy pays out 114.85% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $83.4M, which are larger than SandRidge Energy quarterly revenues of $39M. Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M is lower than SandRidge Energy's net income of $17.6M. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.56x while SandRidge Energy's PE ratio is 6.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.66x versus 3.43x for SandRidge Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 22.53%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 127.27%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $48.33 which suggests that it could grow by 59.73%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than SM Energy.

Ring Energy has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.168%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SM Energy offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $83.4M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.56x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 4.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.66x versus 1.31x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.