SEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Seaboard's net margin of -5.17%. Seaboard's return on equity of 1.89% beat Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84%.

Seaboard has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harte-Hanks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 280.44%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Seaboard.

Seaboard has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks has a beta of 0.098, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.167%.

Seaboard has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Harte-Hanks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seaboard pays 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seaboard quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues of $47.1M. Seaboard's net income of $154M is higher than Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Seaboard's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.04x while Harte-Hanks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seaboard is 0.27x versus 0.18x for Harte-Hanks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Seaboard's net margin of -0.86%. Seaboard's return on equity of 1.89% beat Matthews International's return on equity of -12.82%.

Seaboard has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matthews International has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 99.81%. Given that Matthews International has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Matthews International is more attractive than Seaboard.

Seaboard has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.735%.

Seaboard has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Matthews International offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Seaboard pays 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International pays out -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seaboard quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Matthews International quarterly revenues of $401.8M. Seaboard's net income of $154M is higher than Matthews International's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Seaboard's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.04x while Matthews International's PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seaboard is 0.27x versus 0.37x for Matthews International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NN has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Seaboard's net margin of -19.69%. Seaboard's return on equity of 1.89% beat NN's return on equity of -27.13%.

Seaboard has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NN has an analysts' consensus of $6.67 which suggests that it could grow by 252.73%. Given that NN has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe NN is more attractive than Seaboard.

Seaboard has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NN has a beta of 2.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.703%.

Seaboard has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. NN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seaboard pays 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. NN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seaboard quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than NN quarterly revenues of $106.5M. Seaboard's net income of $154M is higher than NN's net income of -$21M. Notably, Seaboard's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.04x while NN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seaboard is 0.27x versus 0.20x for NN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Seaboard's net margin of -70.61%. Seaboard's return on equity of 1.89% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Seaboard has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seaboard has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Seaboard is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Seaboard has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.065%.

Seaboard has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seaboard pays 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seaboard quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Seaboard's net income of $154M is higher than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Seaboard's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.04x while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seaboard is 0.27x versus 4.26x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.