ADNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Axle & Mfg Holdings has a net margin of 2.22% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of 0.67%. Adient PLC's return on equity of 0.72% beat American Axle & Mfg Holdings's return on equity of 4.83%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $28.10, signalling upside risk potential of 66.77%. On the other hand American Axle & Mfg Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33%. Given that Adient PLC has higher upside potential than American Axle & Mfg Holdings, analysts believe Adient PLC is more attractive than American Axle & Mfg Holdings.

Adient PLC has a beta of 2.146, which suggesting that the stock is 114.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Axle & Mfg Holdings has a beta of 1.951, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.149%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Axle & Mfg Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Axle & Mfg Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than American Axle & Mfg Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Adient PLC's net income of $79M is higher than American Axle & Mfg Holdings's net income of $10M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.26x while American Axle & Mfg Holdings's PE ratio is 24.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.10x versus 0.11x for American Axle & Mfg Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BorgWarner has a net margin of 2.22% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of 6.79%. Adient PLC's return on equity of 0.72% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $28.10, signalling upside risk potential of 66.77%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that Adient PLC has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Adient PLC is more attractive than BorgWarner.

Adient PLC has a beta of 2.146, which suggesting that the stock is 114.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.357%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Adient PLC's net income of $79M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $234M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.26x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 8.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.10x versus 0.51x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 2.22% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of 3.35%. Adient PLC's return on equity of 0.72% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $28.10, signalling upside risk potential of 66.77%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 81.6%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Adient PLC, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Adient PLC.

Adient PLC has a beta of 2.146, which suggesting that the stock is 114.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.319%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Adient PLC's net income of $79M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.26x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.10x versus 0.20x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 2.22% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of --. Adient PLC's return on equity of 0.72% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $28.10, signalling upside risk potential of 66.77%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that Adient PLC has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Adient PLC is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Adient PLC has a beta of 2.146, which suggesting that the stock is 114.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Adient PLC's net income of $79M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.26x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.10x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.