ASX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Foxconn Technology has a net margin of 5.72% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of 2.71%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 9.92% beat Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.31%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of $13.11, signalling upside risk potential of 70.9%. On the other hand Foxconn Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.401% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Foxconn Technology offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 69.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxconn Technology pays out 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $286.8M is higher than Foxconn Technology's net income of $27.9M. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.96x while Foxconn Technology's PE ratio is 22.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 0.91x versus 1.06x for Foxconn Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Himax Technologies has a net margin of 5.72% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of 10.37%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 9.92% beat Himax Technologies's return on equity of 10.48%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of $13.11, signalling upside risk potential of 70.9%. On the other hand Himax Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $10.87 which suggests that it could grow by 79.6%. Given that Himax Technologies has higher upside potential than ASE Technology Holding, analysts believe Himax Technologies is more attractive than ASE Technology Holding.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.401% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.934%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Himax Technologies offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 69.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Himax Technologies pays out 63.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Himax Technologies quarterly revenues of $237.2M. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $286.8M is higher than Himax Technologies's net income of $24.6M. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.96x while Himax Technologies's PE ratio is 12.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 0.91x versus 1.18x for Himax Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a net margin of 5.72% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of 43.14%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 9.92% beat Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's return on equity of 30.23%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of $13.11, signalling upside risk potential of 70.9%. On the other hand Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $247.07 which suggests that it could grow by 68.3%. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.401% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.296%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 69.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing pays out 30.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $5B, which are smaller than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $26.9B. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $286.8M is lower than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's net income of $11.6B. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.96x while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's PE ratio is 20.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 0.91x versus 8.45x for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 5.72% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of 14.07%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 9.92% beat United Microelectronics's return on equity of 12.88%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of $13.11, signalling upside risk potential of 70.9%. On the other hand United Microelectronics has an analysts' consensus of $6.98 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than United Microelectronics, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than United Microelectronics.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.401% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.582%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. United Microelectronics offers a yield of 7.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 69.36% of its earnings as a dividend. United Microelectronics pays out 79.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than United Microelectronics quarterly revenues of $1.9B. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $286.8M is higher than United Microelectronics's net income of $262.8M. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.96x while United Microelectronics's PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 0.91x versus 2.17x for United Microelectronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.