AYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Acuity's net margin of 6.31%. Acuity's return on equity of 17.72% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 11.9%.

Acuity has a consensus price target of $315.25, signalling upside risk potential of 34.97%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of $68.50 which suggests that it could grow by 50.19%. Given that Greenbrier Companies has higher upside potential than Acuity, analysts believe Greenbrier Companies is more attractive than Acuity.

Acuity has a beta of 1.430, which suggesting that the stock is 43.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.834%.

Acuity has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Acuity pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $875.9M. Acuity's net income of $77.5M is higher than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Acuity's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.71x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 7.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity is 1.87x versus 0.41x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Acuity's net margin of 14.21%. Acuity's return on equity of 17.72% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69%.

Acuity has a consensus price target of $315.25, signalling upside risk potential of 34.97%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $142.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.54%. Given that Acuity has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Acuity is more attractive than Lindsay.

Acuity has a beta of 1.430, which suggesting that the stock is 43.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.23%.

Acuity has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Acuity pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $187.1M. Acuity's net income of $77.5M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $26.6M. Notably, Acuity's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.71x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 17.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity is 1.87x versus 2.02x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Acuity's net margin of 11.6%. Acuity's return on equity of 17.72% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.46%.

Acuity has a consensus price target of $315.25, signalling upside risk potential of 34.97%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $29.17 which suggests that it could grow by 25.39%. Given that Acuity has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Acuity is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Acuity has a beta of 1.430, which suggesting that the stock is 43.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.463%.

Acuity has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Acuity pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $304.3M. Acuity's net income of $77.5M is higher than Mueller Water Products's net income of $35.3M. Notably, Acuity's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.71x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 27.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity is 1.87x versus 2.68x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PGD Eco Solutions has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Acuity's net margin of --. Acuity's return on equity of 17.72% beat PGD Eco Solutions's return on equity of --.

Acuity has a consensus price target of $315.25, signalling upside risk potential of 34.97%. On the other hand PGD Eco Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Acuity has higher upside potential than PGD Eco Solutions, analysts believe Acuity is more attractive than PGD Eco Solutions.

Acuity has a beta of 1.430, which suggesting that the stock is 43.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PGD Eco Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Acuity has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. PGD Eco Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acuity pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. PGD Eco Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acuity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than PGD Eco Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Acuity's net income of $77.5M is higher than PGD Eco Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Acuity's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.71x while PGD Eco Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity is 1.87x versus -- for PGD Eco Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.