BALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of 6.39% compared to Ball's net margin of 6.79%. Ball's return on equity of 72.41% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $70.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25.9%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.759% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.357%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ball pays 35.64% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Ball's net income of $197M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $234M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 8.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.27x versus 0.51x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 6.39% compared to Ball's net margin of -5.69%. Ball's return on equity of 72.41% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $70.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25.9%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $110.45 which suggests that it could grow by 32.99%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.759% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.488%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ball pays 35.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Ball's net income of $197M is higher than Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 102.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.27x versus 0.85x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hasbro has a net margin of 6.39% compared to Ball's net margin of 17.42%. Ball's return on equity of 72.41% beat Hasbro's return on equity of -46.99%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $70.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25.9%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $60.96 which suggests that it could grow by 38.24%. Given that Hasbro has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Hasbro is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.759% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.093%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Ball pays 35.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out -26.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Ball's net income of $197M is lower than Hasbro's net income of $223.2M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while Hasbro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.27x versus 1.86x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 6.39% compared to Ball's net margin of 5.73%. Ball's return on equity of 72.41% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 15.47%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $70.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25.9%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $59.36 which suggests that it could grow by 13.77%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Silgan Holdings, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Silgan Holdings.

Ball has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.759% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.693, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.729%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Ball pays 35.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Ball's net income of $197M is higher than Silgan Holdings's net income of $100.1M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 18.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.27x versus 0.97x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.