BGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 1.62% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of --. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $8.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.2%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.66%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. B&G Foods pays -84.61% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $461.1M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. B&G Foods's net income of $7.5M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.29x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 1.62% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 3.13%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Seneca Foods's return on equity of 7.02%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $8.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.2%. On the other hand Seneca Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.290, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.018%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.66%. Seneca Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. B&G Foods pays -84.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods pays out 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $461.1M, which are larger than Seneca Foods quarterly revenues of $425.5M. B&G Foods's net income of $7.5M is lower than Seneca Foods's net income of $13.3M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seneca Foods's PE ratio is 13.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.29x versus 0.37x for Seneca Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 1.62% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of -1.08%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of 6.97%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $8.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.2%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $126.93 which suggests that it could grow by 14.15%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than B&G Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.674%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.66%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. B&G Foods pays -84.61% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $461.1M, which are smaller than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.3B. B&G Foods's net income of $7.5M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$24.5M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.29x versus 1.34x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 1.62% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 3.7%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $8.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.2%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.75%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than B&G Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.66%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. B&G Foods pays -84.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $461.1M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. B&G Foods's net income of $7.5M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.29x versus 0.87x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.