BKKT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Scientific has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Bakkt Holdings's net margin of -477.44%. Bakkt Holdings's return on equity of -39.71% beat Core Scientific's return on equity of --.

Bakkt Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -52.05%. On the other hand Core Scientific has an analysts' consensus of $20.31 which suggests that it could grow by 32.04%. Given that Core Scientific has higher upside potential than Bakkt Holdings, analysts believe Core Scientific is more attractive than Bakkt Holdings.

Bakkt Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bakkt Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Scientific offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bakkt Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Scientific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bakkt Holdings quarterly revenues are $328.4M, which are larger than Core Scientific quarterly revenues of $95.4M. Bakkt Holdings's net income of -$2.9M is higher than Core Scientific's net income of -$455.3M. Notably, Bakkt Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Core Scientific's PE ratio is 21.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bakkt Holdings is 0.07x versus 7.85x for Core Scientific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Digimarc has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Bakkt Holdings's net margin of -113.88%. Bakkt Holdings's return on equity of -39.71% beat Digimarc's return on equity of -56.45%.

Bakkt Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -52.05%. On the other hand Digimarc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -27.37%. Given that Bakkt Holdings has more downside risk than Digimarc, analysts believe Digimarc is more attractive than Bakkt Holdings.

Bakkt Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digimarc has a beta of 1.667, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.742%.

Bakkt Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digimarc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bakkt Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digimarc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bakkt Holdings quarterly revenues are $328.4M, which are larger than Digimarc quarterly revenues of $9.4M. Bakkt Holdings's net income of -$2.9M is higher than Digimarc's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Bakkt Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Digimarc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bakkt Holdings is 0.07x versus 25.29x for Digimarc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Bakkt Holdings's net margin of 4.75%. Bakkt Holdings's return on equity of -39.71% beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 1.92%.

Bakkt Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -52.05%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $42.25 which suggests that it could grow by 49.77%. Given that PDF Solutions has higher upside potential than Bakkt Holdings, analysts believe PDF Solutions is more attractive than Bakkt Holdings.

Bakkt Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.73%.

Bakkt Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bakkt Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bakkt Holdings quarterly revenues are $328.4M, which are larger than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $46.4M. Bakkt Holdings's net income of -$2.9M is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Bakkt Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 256.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bakkt Holdings is 0.07x versus 6.43x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unisys has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Bakkt Holdings's net margin of -12.46%. Bakkt Holdings's return on equity of -39.71% beat Unisys's return on equity of --.

Bakkt Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -52.05%. On the other hand Unisys has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.44%. Given that Unisys has higher upside potential than Bakkt Holdings, analysts believe Unisys is more attractive than Bakkt Holdings.

Bakkt Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unisys has a beta of 0.791, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.891%.

Bakkt Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unisys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bakkt Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unisys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bakkt Holdings quarterly revenues are $328.4M, which are smaller than Unisys quarterly revenues of $497M. Bakkt Holdings's net income of -$2.9M is higher than Unisys's net income of -$61.9M. Notably, Bakkt Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unisys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bakkt Holdings is 0.07x versus 0.23x for Unisys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.