BPT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of -- compared to BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net margin of 81.52%. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's return on equity of -- beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 74.27%.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 94.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.246, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.443%.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 9.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust pays 113.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $286.5K. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net income of -$272K is lower than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $233.6K. Notably, BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 10.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust is 0.18x versus 7.66x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a net margin of -- compared to BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net margin of 0.18%. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's return on equity of -- beat NGL Energy Partners LP's return on equity of -24.68%.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NGL Energy Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.16%. Given that NGL Energy Partners LP has higher upside potential than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust, analysts believe NGL Energy Partners LP is more attractive than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 94.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGL Energy Partners LP has a beta of 1.745, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.499%.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NGL Energy Partners LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust pays 113.66% of its earnings as a dividend. NGL Energy Partners LP pays out -124.03% of its earnings as a dividend.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NGL Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues of $1.4B. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net income of -$272K is lower than NGL Energy Partners LP's net income of $2.5M. Notably, BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NGL Energy Partners LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust is 0.18x versus 0.10x for NGL Energy Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of -- compared to BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net margin of 0.26%. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's return on equity of -- beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 1.12%.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.58 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 94.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.385%.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 6.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust pays 113.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 105.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $12.7B. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net income of -$272K is lower than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $33M. Notably, BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 21.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust is 0.18x versus 0.07x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabine Royalty Trust has a net margin of -- compared to BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net margin of 96.39%. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's return on equity of -- beat Sabine Royalty Trust's return on equity of 1153.29%.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sabine Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -47.58%. Given that Sabine Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust, analysts believe Sabine Royalty Trust is more attractive than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 94.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabine Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.866%.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sabine Royalty Trust offers a yield of 8.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust pays 113.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sabine Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $19.8M. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net income of -$272K is lower than Sabine Royalty Trust's net income of $19.1M. Notably, BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sabine Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 9.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust is 0.18x versus 9.30x for Sabine Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.