BTU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cornerstone Building Brands has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of --. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 10.16% beat Cornerstone Building Brands's return on equity of --.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 71.04%. On the other hand Cornerstone Building Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Cornerstone Building Brands, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Cornerstone Building Brands.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.05% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cornerstone Building Brands has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Cornerstone Building Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Cornerstone Building Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Cornerstone Building Brands quarterly revenues of --. Peabody Energy's net income of $30.6M is higher than Cornerstone Building Brands's net income of --. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Cornerstone Building Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.49x versus -- for Cornerstone Building Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -229.03%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 10.16% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -87.54%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 71.04%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.9%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Hallador Energy, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Hallador Energy.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.05% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.553, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.711%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $94.2M. Peabody Energy's net income of $30.6M is higher than Hallador Energy's net income of -$215.8M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.49x versus 1.30x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 10.74%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 10.16% beat NACCO Industries's return on equity of 8.65%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 71.04%. On the other hand NACCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.12%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than NACCO Industries, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than NACCO Industries.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.05% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.452%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. NACCO Industries offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries pays out 19.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than NACCO Industries quarterly revenues of $70.4M. Peabody Energy's net income of $30.6M is higher than NACCO Industries's net income of $7.6M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while NACCO Industries's PE ratio is 7.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.49x versus 1.06x for NACCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 66.05%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 10.16% beat Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 34.04%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 71.04%. On the other hand Natural Resources Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -85.71%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.05% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.392, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.837%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Natural Resources Partners LP offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP pays out 42.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues of $64.8M. Peabody Energy's net income of $30.6M is lower than Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $42.8M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Natural Resources Partners LP's PE ratio is 9.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.49x versus 5.81x for Natural Resources Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.