CHPT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of -77.89% compared to ChargePoint Holdings's net margin of --. ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -110.99% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

ChargePoint Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.27, signalling upside risk potential of 69.69%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 865.91%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than ChargePoint Holdings, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than ChargePoint Holdings.

ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.024% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.688%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ChargePoint Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$77.6M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, ChargePoint Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ChargePoint Holdings is 1.23x versus 0.06x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Driven Brands Holdings has a net margin of -77.89% compared to ChargePoint Holdings's net margin of -2.53%. ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -110.99% beat Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of 0.69%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.27, signalling upside risk potential of 69.69%. On the other hand Driven Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.76%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.024% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Driven Brands Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ChargePoint Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Driven Brands Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are smaller than Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $591.7M. ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$77.6M is lower than Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$14.9M. Notably, ChargePoint Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Driven Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 401.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ChargePoint Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.10x for Driven Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of -77.89% compared to ChargePoint Holdings's net margin of 8.96%. ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -110.99% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 7.87%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.27, signalling upside risk potential of 69.69%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.58 which suggests that it could grow by 35.48%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Mister Car Wash, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Mister Car Wash.

ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.024% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ChargePoint Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are smaller than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $249.3M. ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$77.6M is lower than Mister Car Wash's net income of $22.3M. Notably, ChargePoint Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 30.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ChargePoint Holdings is 1.23x versus 2.39x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valvoline has a net margin of -77.89% compared to ChargePoint Holdings's net margin of 21.19%. ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -110.99% beat Valvoline's return on equity of 170.51%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.27, signalling upside risk potential of 69.69%. On the other hand Valvoline has an analysts' consensus of $43.62 which suggests that it could grow by 19.33%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Valvoline.

ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.024% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valvoline has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.993%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valvoline offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ChargePoint Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valvoline pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are smaller than Valvoline quarterly revenues of $435.5M. ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$77.6M is lower than Valvoline's net income of $92.3M. Notably, ChargePoint Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Valvoline's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ChargePoint Holdings is 1.23x versus 2.96x for Valvoline. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.