CRGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matador Resources has a net margin of -13.49% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 21.93%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.97% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.31%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.6%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $73.06 which suggests that it could grow by 44.64%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Matador Resources, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Matador Resources.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 3.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.549%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Crescent Energy pays -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $875.3M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $978.3M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$118M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $214.5M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 7.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.77x versus 1.80x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of -13.49% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -1.88%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.97% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.6%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $58.78 which suggests that it could grow by 20.38%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.174%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Crescent Energy pays -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $875.3M, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Crescent Energy's net income of -$118M is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.77x versus 1.77x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PHX Minerals has a net margin of -13.49% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.21%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.97% beat PHX Minerals's return on equity of 1.89%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.6%. On the other hand PHX Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $5.13 which suggests that it could grow by 28.13%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than PHX Minerals, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than PHX Minerals.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PHX Minerals has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.367%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. PHX Minerals offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Crescent Energy pays -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. PHX Minerals pays out 225.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $875.3M, which are larger than PHX Minerals quarterly revenues of $9M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$118M is lower than PHX Minerals's net income of $109.4K. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while PHX Minerals's PE ratio is 66.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.77x versus 4.26x for PHX Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PrimeEnergy Resources has a net margin of -13.49% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 33.12%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.97% beat PrimeEnergy Resources's return on equity of 33.66%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.6%. On the other hand PrimeEnergy Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than PrimeEnergy Resources, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than PrimeEnergy Resources.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PrimeEnergy Resources has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.003%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. PrimeEnergy Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Energy pays -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. PrimeEnergy Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $875.3M, which are larger than PrimeEnergy Resources quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$118M is lower than PrimeEnergy Resources's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while PrimeEnergy Resources's PE ratio is 9.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.77x versus 2.72x for PrimeEnergy Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.