CSV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Carriage Services's net margin of 8.96%. Carriage Services's return on equity of 19.3% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 7.87%.

Carriage Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.96%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.58 which suggests that it could grow by 35.48%. Given that Mister Car Wash has higher upside potential than Carriage Services, analysts believe Mister Car Wash is more attractive than Carriage Services.

Carriage Services has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Carriage Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carriage Services pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carriage Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carriage Services quarterly revenues are $100.7M, which are smaller than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $249.3M. Carriage Services's net income of $9.9M is lower than Mister Car Wash's net income of $22.3M. Notably, Carriage Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.15x while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 30.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carriage Services is 1.54x versus 2.39x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patrick Industries has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Carriage Services's net margin of 4.45%. Carriage Services's return on equity of 19.3% beat Patrick Industries's return on equity of 14.42%.

Carriage Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.96%. On the other hand Patrick Industries has an analysts' consensus of $103.80 which suggests that it could grow by 25.2%. Given that Patrick Industries has higher upside potential than Carriage Services, analysts believe Patrick Industries is more attractive than Carriage Services.

Carriage Services has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patrick Industries has a beta of 1.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.678%.

Carriage Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Patrick Industries offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Carriage Services pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Patrick Industries pays out 29.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carriage Services quarterly revenues are $100.7M, which are smaller than Patrick Industries quarterly revenues of $919.4M. Carriage Services's net income of $9.9M is lower than Patrick Industries's net income of $40.9M. Notably, Carriage Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.15x while Patrick Industries's PE ratio is 17.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carriage Services is 1.54x versus 0.76x for Patrick Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Service Corp International has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Carriage Services's net margin of 11.62%. Carriage Services's return on equity of 19.3% beat Service Corp International's return on equity of 31.88%.

Carriage Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.96%. On the other hand Service Corp International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.26%. Given that Carriage Services has higher upside potential than Service Corp International, analysts believe Carriage Services is more attractive than Service Corp International.

Carriage Services has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Service Corp International has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.72%.

Carriage Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Service Corp International offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Carriage Services pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Service Corp International pays out 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carriage Services quarterly revenues are $100.7M, which are smaller than Service Corp International quarterly revenues of $1B. Carriage Services's net income of $9.9M is lower than Service Corp International's net income of $117.8M. Notably, Carriage Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.15x while Service Corp International's PE ratio is 23.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carriage Services is 1.54x versus 2.90x for Service Corp International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WW International has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Carriage Services's net margin of -23.95%. Carriage Services's return on equity of 19.3% beat WW International's return on equity of --.

Carriage Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.96%. On the other hand WW International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -18.88%. Given that Carriage Services has higher upside potential than WW International, analysts believe Carriage Services is more attractive than WW International.

Carriage Services has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WW International has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.612%.

Carriage Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. WW International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carriage Services pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. WW International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carriage Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carriage Services quarterly revenues are $100.7M, which are smaller than WW International quarterly revenues of $192.9M. Carriage Services's net income of $9.9M is higher than WW International's net income of -$46.2M. Notably, Carriage Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.15x while WW International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carriage Services is 1.54x versus 0.13x for WW International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.