CURV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of -0.45% compared to Torrid Holdings's net margin of 10.92%. Torrid Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 48.87%.

Torrid Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -12.13%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $184.65 which suggests that it could grow by 19.47%. Given that Abercrombie & Fitch has higher upside potential than Torrid Holdings, analysts believe Abercrombie & Fitch is more attractive than Torrid Holdings.

Torrid Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.248%.

Torrid Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Torrid Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Torrid Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.8M, which are smaller than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Torrid Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $132M. Notably, Torrid Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.87x while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Torrid Holdings is 0.45x versus 1.72x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

J.Jill has a net margin of -0.45% compared to Torrid Holdings's net margin of 8.16%. Torrid Holdings's return on equity of -- beat J.Jill's return on equity of 66.54%.

Torrid Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -12.13%. On the other hand J.Jill has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.65%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Torrid Holdings, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Torrid Holdings.

Torrid Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison J.Jill has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.564%.

Torrid Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. J.Jill offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Torrid Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. J.Jill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Torrid Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.8M, which are larger than J.Jill quarterly revenues of $151.3M. Torrid Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than J.Jill's net income of $12.3M. Notably, Torrid Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.87x while J.Jill's PE ratio is 9.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Torrid Holdings is 0.45x versus 0.64x for J.Jill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of -0.45% compared to Torrid Holdings's net margin of 7.56%. Torrid Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Torrid Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -12.13%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could fall by -14.9%. Given that Urban Outfitters has more downside risk than Torrid Holdings, analysts believe Torrid Holdings is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Torrid Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.524%.

Torrid Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Torrid Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Torrid Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.8M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Torrid Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Torrid Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.87x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Torrid Holdings is 0.45x versus 0.96x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & has a net margin of -0.45% compared to Torrid Holdings's net margin of -4.16%. Torrid Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 36.99%.

Torrid Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -12.13%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & has an analysts' consensus of $21.49 which suggests that it could fall by -0.57%. Given that Torrid Holdings has more downside risk than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe Victoria's Secret & is more attractive than Torrid Holdings.

Torrid Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Torrid Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria's Secret & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Torrid Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Torrid Holdings quarterly revenues are $263.8M, which are smaller than Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Torrid Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$56M. Notably, Torrid Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.87x while Victoria's Secret &'s PE ratio is 23.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Torrid Holdings is 0.45x versus 0.58x for Victoria's Secret &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.