CVEO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of -2.89% compared to Civeo's net margin of 2.3%. Civeo's return on equity of 7.01% beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.04%.

Civeo has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 47.13%. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Civeo has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe Civeo is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

Civeo has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.525% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.258%.

Civeo has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Civeo pays 24.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Civeo quarterly revenues are $176.3M, which are larger than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $48.8M. Civeo's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Civeo's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 15.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Civeo is 0.46x versus 0.25x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyatt Hotels has a net margin of -2.89% compared to Civeo's net margin of 28.91%. Civeo's return on equity of 7.01% beat Hyatt Hotels's return on equity of 37.51%.

Civeo has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 47.13%. On the other hand Hyatt Hotels has an analysts' consensus of $162.48 which suggests that it could grow by 2.45%. Given that Civeo has higher upside potential than Hyatt Hotels, analysts believe Civeo is more attractive than Hyatt Hotels.

Civeo has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.525% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyatt Hotels has a beta of 1.500, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.953%.

Civeo has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Hyatt Hotels offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Civeo pays 24.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyatt Hotels pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Civeo quarterly revenues are $176.3M, which are smaller than Hyatt Hotels quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Civeo's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Hyatt Hotels's net income of $471M. Notably, Civeo's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Hyatt Hotels's PE ratio is 11.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Civeo is 0.46x versus 2.47x for Hyatt Hotels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott Vacations Worldwide has a net margin of -2.89% compared to Civeo's net margin of 6.44%. Civeo's return on equity of 7.01% beat Marriott Vacations Worldwide's return on equity of 8.49%.

Civeo has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 47.13%. On the other hand Marriott Vacations Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.16%. Given that Civeo has higher upside potential than Marriott Vacations Worldwide, analysts believe Civeo is more attractive than Marriott Vacations Worldwide.

Civeo has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.525% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott Vacations Worldwide has a beta of 1.837, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.671%.

Civeo has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Marriott Vacations Worldwide offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Civeo pays 24.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott Vacations Worldwide pays out 41.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Civeo quarterly revenues are $176.3M, which are smaller than Marriott Vacations Worldwide quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Civeo's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Marriott Vacations Worldwide's net income of $84M. Notably, Civeo's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Marriott Vacations Worldwide's PE ratio is 17.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Civeo is 0.46x versus 0.80x for Marriott Vacations Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Notes Live Holding has a net margin of -2.89% compared to Civeo's net margin of --. Civeo's return on equity of 7.01% beat Notes Live Holding's return on equity of --.

Civeo has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 47.13%. On the other hand Notes Live Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Civeo has higher upside potential than Notes Live Holding, analysts believe Civeo is more attractive than Notes Live Holding.

Civeo has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.525% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Notes Live Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Civeo has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Notes Live Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Civeo pays 24.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Notes Live Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Civeo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Civeo quarterly revenues are $176.3M, which are larger than Notes Live Holding quarterly revenues of --. Civeo's net income of -$5.1M is higher than Notes Live Holding's net income of --. Notably, Civeo's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Notes Live Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Civeo is 0.46x versus -- for Notes Live Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.