CVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clean Energy Fuels has a net margin of -6.77% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -17.33%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 6.79% beat Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -9.9%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Clean Energy Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $7.08 which suggests that it could grow by 186.56%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.580, which suggesting that the stock is 57.985% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.338%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.06%. Clean Energy Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVR Energy pays 58.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Clean Energy Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues of $104.9M. CVR Energy's net income of -$124M is lower than Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$18.2M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.20x while Clean Energy Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.23x versus 1.37x for Clean Energy Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of -6.77% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of 0.91%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 6.79% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.52%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 63.22%. Given that Icahn Enterprises LP has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Icahn Enterprises LP is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.580, which suggesting that the stock is 57.985% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.964%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.06%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 38.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CVR Energy pays 58.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out -44.88% of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.4B. CVR Energy's net income of -$124M is lower than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of $22M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.20x while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.23x versus 0.40x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -6.77% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of 0.97%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 6.79% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 10.89%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $141.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.15%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.580, which suggesting that the stock is 57.985% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.962%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.06%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. CVR Energy pays 58.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $35.5B. CVR Energy's net income of -$124M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $346M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.20x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.23x versus 0.32x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -6.77% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of 1.11%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 6.79% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 13.03%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.39 which suggests that it could grow by 25.91%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.580, which suggesting that the stock is 57.985% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.739%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.06%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. CVR Energy pays 58.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 16.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $32.9B. CVR Energy's net income of -$124M is lower than Valero Energy's net income of $364M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.20x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.23x versus 0.29x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.