DV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDW has a net margin of 12.28% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of 5.1%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12% beat CDW's return on equity of 48.73%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.92, signalling upside risk potential of 45.69%. On the other hand CDW has an analysts' consensus of $225.93 which suggests that it could grow by 35.29%. Given that DoubleVerify Holdings has higher upside potential than CDW, analysts believe DoubleVerify Holdings is more attractive than CDW.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDW has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.705%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDW offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDW pays out 30.81% of its earnings as a dividend. CDW's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $190.6M, which are smaller than CDW quarterly revenues of $5.2B. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M is lower than CDW's net income of $264.2M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.32x while CDW's PE ratio is 20.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.82x versus 1.08x for CDW. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Concentrix has a net margin of 12.28% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of 4.72%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12% beat Concentrix's return on equity of 6.12%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.92, signalling upside risk potential of 45.69%. On the other hand Concentrix has an analysts' consensus of $68.83 which suggests that it could grow by 52.83%. Given that Concentrix has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Concentrix is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concentrix has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Concentrix offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concentrix pays out 33.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Concentrix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $190.6M, which are smaller than Concentrix quarterly revenues of $2.4B. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M is lower than Concentrix's net income of $115.7M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.32x while Concentrix's PE ratio is 12.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.82x versus 0.30x for Concentrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RingCentral has a net margin of 12.28% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -1.17%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12% beat RingCentral's return on equity of --.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.92, signalling upside risk potential of 45.69%. On the other hand RingCentral has an analysts' consensus of $38.42 which suggests that it could grow by 42.3%. Given that DoubleVerify Holdings has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe DoubleVerify Holdings is more attractive than RingCentral.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.234%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RingCentral offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $190.6M, which are smaller than RingCentral quarterly revenues of $614.5M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M is higher than RingCentral's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.32x while RingCentral's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.82x versus 1.04x for RingCentral. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 12.28% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of 4.84%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.92, signalling upside risk potential of 45.69%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $34.77 which suggests that it could grow by 148.71%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $190.6M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $314.7M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.32x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.82x versus 2.58x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.