EPAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXC Technology has a net margin of 8.28% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 1.77%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 12.96% beat DXC Technology's return on equity of -2.34%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $254.92, signalling upside risk potential of 39.51%. On the other hand DXC Technology has an analysts' consensus of $23.11 which suggests that it could grow by 33.75%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than DXC Technology, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than DXC Technology.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.606, which suggesting that the stock is 60.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXC Technology has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.941%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXC Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXC Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than DXC Technology quarterly revenues of $3.2B. EPAM Systems's net income of $103.3M is higher than DXC Technology's net income of $57M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.31x while DXC Technology's PE ratio is 282.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.24x versus 0.24x for DXC Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

F5 has a net margin of 8.28% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 21.72%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 12.96% beat F5's return on equity of 19.61%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $254.92, signalling upside risk potential of 39.51%. On the other hand F5 has an analysts' consensus of $304.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.68%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than F5.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.606, which suggesting that the stock is 60.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F5 has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.166%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. F5 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. F5 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than F5 quarterly revenues of $766.5M. EPAM Systems's net income of $103.3M is lower than F5's net income of $166.4M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.31x while F5's PE ratio is 26.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.24x versus 5.38x for F5. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 8.28% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 9.55%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 12.96% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $254.92, signalling upside risk potential of 39.51%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $86.61 which suggests that it could grow by 0.43%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.606, which suggesting that the stock is 60.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. EPAM Systems's net income of $103.3M is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.31x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 453.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.24x versus 73.76x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upbound Group has a net margin of 8.28% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 2.87%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 12.96% beat Upbound Group's return on equity of 20.75%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $254.92, signalling upside risk potential of 39.51%. On the other hand Upbound Group has an analysts' consensus of $39.89 which suggests that it could grow by 62.41%. Given that Upbound Group has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Upbound Group is more attractive than EPAM Systems.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.606, which suggesting that the stock is 60.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upbound Group has a beta of 2.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.845%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upbound Group offers a yield of 6.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upbound Group pays out 66.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Upbound Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Upbound Group quarterly revenues of $1.1B. EPAM Systems's net income of $103.3M is higher than Upbound Group's net income of $31M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.31x while Upbound Group's PE ratio is 11.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.24x versus 0.32x for Upbound Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.