Financhill
Buy
68

ET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$18.72
Seasonality move :
13.01%
Day range:
$18.32 - $18.78
52-week range:
$14.90 - $21.45
Dividend yield:
6.86%
P/E ratio:
14.63x
P/S ratio:
0.77x
P/B ratio:
1.83x
Volume:
10.8M
Avg. volume:
17.7M
1-year change:
24.53%
Market cap:
$64.3B
Revenue:
$82.7B
EPS (TTM):
$1.28

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$23.6B $0.35 10.39% -0.99% $22.73
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
$2.5B $1.00 12.55% -15.25% $55.47
DTM
DT Midstream
$299M $1.10 18.66% 4.98% $102.72
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners LP
$14.2B $0.70 -3.75% 10.72% $36.78
LNG
Cheniere Energy
$4.6B $2.60 11.16% 41.78% $254.00
WMB
Williams Companies
$2.7B $0.47 3.15% 4.29% $58.83
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$18.73 $22.73 $64.3B 14.63x $0.33 6.86% 0.77x
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
$63.41 $55.47 $30.7B 14.89x $0.82 5.13% 3.53x
DTM
DT Midstream
$95.79 $102.72 $9.7B 26.61x $0.82 3.07% 9.61x
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners LP
$33.59 $36.78 $72.7B 12.49x $0.54 6.25% 1.31x
LNG
Cheniere Energy
$218.53 $254.00 $48.9B 15.36x $0.50 0.86% 3.19x
WMB
Williams Companies
$57.27 $58.83 $69.8B 31.47x $0.50 3.36% 6.67x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ET
Energy Transfer LP
100% 1.421 76.1% 0.84x
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
100% 1.012 58.77% 0.48x
DTM
DT Midstream
42.85% 1.281 34.7% 0.58x
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners LP
100% 1.537 46.38% 0.65x
LNG
Cheniere Energy
80.08% 1.154 43.64% 0.76x
WMB
Williams Companies
68.39% 1.000 39.34% 0.36x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$4B $2.3B 7.22% 10.55% 12.23% $1.1B
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
$1.1B $812M 16.12% -- 33.33% $827M
DTM
DT Midstream
$196M $113M 4.7% 8.03% 62.25% $62M
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners LP
$1.9B $1.9B 18.83% 20.38% 14.01% $1.3B
LNG
Cheniere Energy
$1.9B $1.7B 9.94% 35.87% 40.24% $1.1B
WMB
Williams Companies
$1.6B $793M 5.35% 14.98% 34.49% $418M

Energy Transfer LP vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ET or CQP?

    Cheniere Energy Partners LP has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 25.33%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat Cheniere Energy Partners LP's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    20.52% $0.29 $71.1B
    CQP
    Cheniere Energy Partners LP
    45.41% $1.05 $15.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ET or CQP?

    Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $22.73, signalling upside risk potential of 21.37%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $55.47 which suggests that it could fall by -12.53%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy Partners LP, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Cheniere Energy Partners LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    10 1 0
    CQP
    Cheniere Energy Partners LP
    0 7 4
  • Is ET or CQP More Risky?

    Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.668%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or CQP?

    Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.86%. Cheniere Energy Partners LP offers a yield of 5.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy Partners LP pays out 89.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or CQP?

    Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Cheniere Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is higher than Cheniere Energy Partners LP's net income of $623M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.63x while Cheniere Energy Partners LP's PE ratio is 14.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.77x versus 3.53x for Cheniere Energy Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    0.77x 14.63x $19.5B $1.1B
    CQP
    Cheniere Energy Partners LP
    3.53x 14.89x $2.5B $623M
  • Which has Higher Returns ET or DTM?

    DT Midstream has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 29.32%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat DT Midstream's return on equity of 8.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    20.52% $0.29 $71.1B
    DTM
    DT Midstream
    78.72% $0.73 $8.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About ET or DTM?

    Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $22.73, signalling upside risk potential of 21.37%. On the other hand DT Midstream has an analysts' consensus of $102.72 which suggests that it could grow by 7.24%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than DT Midstream.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    10 1 0
    DTM
    DT Midstream
    4 7 1
  • Is ET or DTM More Risky?

    Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DT Midstream has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or DTM?

    Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.86%. DT Midstream offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. DT Midstream pays out 79.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or DTM?

    Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than DT Midstream quarterly revenues of $249M. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is higher than DT Midstream's net income of $73M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.63x while DT Midstream's PE ratio is 26.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.77x versus 9.61x for DT Midstream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    0.77x 14.63x $19.5B $1.1B
    DTM
    DT Midstream
    9.61x 26.61x $249M $73M
  • Which has Higher Returns ET or EPD?

    Enterprise Products Partners LP has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 11.41%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat Enterprise Products Partners LP's return on equity of 20.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    20.52% $0.29 $71.1B
    EPD
    Enterprise Products Partners LP
    13.56% $0.74 $32.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About ET or EPD?

    Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $22.73, signalling upside risk potential of 21.37%. On the other hand Enterprise Products Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $36.78 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Enterprise Products Partners LP, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Enterprise Products Partners LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    10 1 0
    EPD
    Enterprise Products Partners LP
    10 6 0
  • Is ET or EPD More Risky?

    Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enterprise Products Partners LP has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.691%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or EPD?

    Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.86%. Enterprise Products Partners LP offers a yield of 6.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Enterprise Products Partners LP pays out 76.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or EPD?

    Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Enterprise Products Partners LP quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is lower than Enterprise Products Partners LP's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.63x while Enterprise Products Partners LP's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.77x versus 1.31x for Enterprise Products Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    0.77x 14.63x $19.5B $1.1B
    EPD
    Enterprise Products Partners LP
    1.31x 12.49x $14.2B $1.6B
  • Which has Higher Returns ET or LNG?

    Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 22.02%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 35.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    20.52% $0.29 $71.1B
    LNG
    Cheniere Energy
    42.58% $4.33 $33B
  • What do Analysts Say About ET or LNG?

    Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $22.73, signalling upside risk potential of 21.37%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $254.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.23%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Cheniere Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    10 1 0
    LNG
    Cheniere Energy
    14 2 0
  • Is ET or LNG More Risky?

    Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.458%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or LNG?

    Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.86%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or LNG?

    Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is higher than Cheniere Energy's net income of $977M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.63x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 15.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.77x versus 3.19x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    0.77x 14.63x $19.5B $1.1B
    LNG
    Cheniere Energy
    3.19x 15.36x $4.4B $977M
  • Which has Higher Returns ET or WMB?

    Williams Companies has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 17.72%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat Williams Companies's return on equity of 14.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    20.52% $0.29 $71.1B
    WMB
    Williams Companies
    56.73% $0.39 $41.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About ET or WMB?

    Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $22.73, signalling upside risk potential of 21.37%. On the other hand Williams Companies has an analysts' consensus of $58.83 which suggests that it could grow by 2.73%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Williams Companies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    10 1 0
    WMB
    Williams Companies
    8 9 1
  • Is ET or WMB More Risky?

    Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams Companies has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.347%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or WMB?

    Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.86%. Williams Companies offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies pays out 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or WMB?

    Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Williams Companies quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is higher than Williams Companies's net income of $486M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.63x while Williams Companies's PE ratio is 31.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.77x versus 6.67x for Williams Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ET
    Energy Transfer LP
    0.77x 14.63x $19.5B $1.1B
    WMB
    Williams Companies
    6.67x 31.47x $2.7B $486M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?
Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?

When the Federal Reserve started hiking rates in 2022, banks’…

Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?
Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?

Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) share price has been on the proverbial ropes…

Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?
Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?

Chip giant QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) was the ultimate chip company…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
59
GRRR alert for Mar 15

Gorilla Technology Group [GRRR] is up 29.72% over the past day.

Sell
49
SMTC alert for Mar 15

Semtech [SMTC] is up 21.28% over the past day.

Buy
62
PLPC alert for Mar 15

Preformed Line Products [PLPC] is up 17.38% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock