FCN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 7.18% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 7.18%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 16.4%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.87%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.85%. Given that FTI Consulting has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe FTI Consulting is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 87.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.553%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $926M, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $378.1M. FTI Consulting's net income of $66.5M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $27.1M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 26.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.86x versus 1.58x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 7.18% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 6.32%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.6%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.87%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.49%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 87.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.825%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $926M, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $517M. FTI Consulting's net income of $66.5M is higher than ICF International's net income of $32.7M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while ICF International's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.86x versus 1.13x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Initio has a net margin of 7.18% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of --. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14% beat Initio's return on equity of --.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.87%. On the other hand Initio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FTI Consulting has higher upside potential than Initio, analysts believe FTI Consulting is more attractive than Initio.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 87.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Initio has a beta of -0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.339%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Initio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Initio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $926M, which are larger than Initio quarterly revenues of --. FTI Consulting's net income of $66.5M is higher than Initio's net income of --. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Initio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.86x versus -- for Initio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maximus has a net margin of 7.18% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 5.51%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14% beat Maximus's return on equity of 17.37%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.87%. On the other hand Maximus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.23%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 87.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maximus has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.015%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maximus offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus pays out 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $926M, which are smaller than Maximus quarterly revenues of $1.3B. FTI Consulting's net income of $66.5M is lower than Maximus's net income of $72.5M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Maximus's PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.86x versus 0.85x for Maximus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.