FL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boot Barn Holdings has a net margin of 2.18% compared to Foot Locker's net margin of 12.34%. Foot Locker's return on equity of 0.42% beat Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.48%.

Foot Locker has a consensus price target of $20.13, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Boot Barn Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $189.08 which suggests that it could grow by 76.23%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Foot Locker has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.636% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 2.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.835%.

Foot Locker has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boot Barn Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foot Locker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boot Barn Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foot Locker quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues of $608.2M. Foot Locker's net income of $49M is lower than Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $75.1M. Notably, Foot Locker's price-to-earnings ratio is 123.46x while Boot Barn Holdings's PE ratio is 19.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foot Locker is 0.19x versus 1.79x for Boot Barn Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of 2.18% compared to Foot Locker's net margin of 13.48%. Foot Locker's return on equity of 0.42% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.46%.

Foot Locker has a consensus price target of $20.13, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $100.10 which suggests that it could grow by 31.52%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Foot Locker has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.636% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.791%.

Foot Locker has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foot Locker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foot Locker quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Foot Locker's net income of $49M is lower than Five Below's net income of $187.5M. Notably, Foot Locker's price-to-earnings ratio is 123.46x while Five Below's PE ratio is 16.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foot Locker is 0.19x versus 1.08x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leslies has a net margin of 2.18% compared to Foot Locker's net margin of -25.43%. Foot Locker's return on equity of 0.42% beat Leslies's return on equity of --.

Foot Locker has a consensus price target of $20.13, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Leslies has an analysts' consensus of $2.30 which suggests that it could grow by 188.08%. Given that Leslies has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Leslies is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Foot Locker has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.636% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leslies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foot Locker has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leslies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foot Locker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leslies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foot Locker quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Leslies quarterly revenues of $175.2M. Foot Locker's net income of $49M is higher than Leslies's net income of -$44.6M. Notably, Foot Locker's price-to-earnings ratio is 123.46x while Leslies's PE ratio is 151.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foot Locker is 0.19x versus 0.11x for Leslies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 2.18% compared to Foot Locker's net margin of 6.27%. Foot Locker's return on equity of 0.42% beat Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 12.42%.

Foot Locker has a consensus price target of $20.13, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Shoe Carnival has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 35.92%. Given that Shoe Carnival has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Shoe Carnival is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Foot Locker has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.636% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.688%.

Foot Locker has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoe Carnival offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Foot Locker pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival pays out 16.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Foot Locker quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Shoe Carnival quarterly revenues of $306.9M. Foot Locker's net income of $49M is higher than Shoe Carnival's net income of $19.2M. Notably, Foot Locker's price-to-earnings ratio is 123.46x while Shoe Carnival's PE ratio is 8.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foot Locker is 0.19x versus 0.50x for Shoe Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.