FTK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC PLC has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Flotek Industries's net margin of 9.49%. Flotek Industries's return on equity of 9.81% beat TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.91%.

Flotek Industries has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 1.21%. On the other hand TechnipFMC PLC has an analysts' consensus of $34.26 which suggests that it could grow by 21.19%. Given that TechnipFMC PLC has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe TechnipFMC PLC is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.931% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.274%.

Flotek Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TechnipFMC PLC offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Flotek Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC pays out 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flotek Industries quarterly revenues are $50.8M, which are smaller than TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Flotek Industries's net income of $4.4M is lower than TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $224.7M. Notably, Flotek Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.94x while TechnipFMC PLC's PE ratio is 14.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flotek Industries is 1.69x versus 1.37x for TechnipFMC PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Flotek Industries's net margin of 10.96%. Flotek Industries's return on equity of 9.81% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

Flotek Industries has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 1.21%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $34.19 which suggests that it could grow by 35.55%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.931% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.903%.

Flotek Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Flotek Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flotek Industries quarterly revenues are $50.8M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Flotek Industries's net income of $4.4M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, Flotek Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.94x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flotek Industries is 1.69x versus 0.97x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Flotek Industries's net margin of -8.82%. Flotek Industries's return on equity of 9.81% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87%.

Flotek Industries has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 1.21%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 157.73%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.931% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.982, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.243%.

Flotek Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flotek Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flotek Industries quarterly revenues are $50.8M, which are smaller than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $165.5M. Flotek Industries's net income of $4.4M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M. Notably, Flotek Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.94x while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flotek Industries is 1.69x versus 0.09x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Flotek Industries's net margin of -6.25%. Flotek Industries's return on equity of 9.81% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Flotek Industries has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 1.21%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $1.25 which suggests that it could fall by -3.1%. Given that Flotek Industries has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Flotek Industries is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.931% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 257.676%.

Flotek Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flotek Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flotek Industries quarterly revenues are $50.8M, which are smaller than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Flotek Industries's net income of $4.4M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Flotek Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.94x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flotek Industries is 1.69x versus 0.09x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.