HPP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Creative Media & Community Trust has a net margin of -47.54% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties's net margin of -36.29%. Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02% beat Creative Media & Community Trust's return on equity of -6.37%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $6.08, signalling upside risk potential of 71.68%. On the other hand Creative Media & Community Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3085.21%. Given that Creative Media & Community Trust has higher upside potential than Hudson Pacific Properties, analysts believe Creative Media & Community Trust is more attractive than Hudson Pacific Properties.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.259% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Creative Media & Community Trust has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.551%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Creative Media & Community Trust offers a yield of 270.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Hudson Pacific Properties pays -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Creative Media & Community Trust pays out -76.79% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues are $200.4M, which are larger than Creative Media & Community Trust quarterly revenues of $28.6M. Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M is lower than Creative Media & Community Trust's net income of -$10.4M. Notably, Hudson Pacific Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Creative Media & Community Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Pacific Properties is 0.47x versus 0.02x for Creative Media & Community Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Street Properties has a net margin of -47.54% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties's net margin of -52.63%. Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02% beat Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -5.84%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $6.08, signalling upside risk potential of 71.68%. On the other hand Franklin Street Properties has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that Hudson Pacific Properties has higher upside potential than Franklin Street Properties, analysts believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more attractive than Franklin Street Properties.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.259% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.841%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Franklin Street Properties offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hudson Pacific Properties pays -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Street Properties pays out -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues are $200.4M, which are larger than Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues of $29.7M. Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M is lower than Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$15.6M. Notably, Hudson Pacific Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Street Properties's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Pacific Properties is 0.47x versus 1.55x for Franklin Street Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Piedmont Office Realty Trust has a net margin of -47.54% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties's net margin of -8.27%. Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02% beat Piedmont Office Realty Trust's return on equity of -4.56%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $6.08, signalling upside risk potential of 71.68%. On the other hand Piedmont Office Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.43%. Given that Hudson Pacific Properties has higher upside potential than Piedmont Office Realty Trust, analysts believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more attractive than Piedmont Office Realty Trust.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.259% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Piedmont Office Realty Trust has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.539%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Piedmont Office Realty Trust offers a yield of 5.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hudson Pacific Properties pays -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Piedmont Office Realty Trust pays out -192.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues are $200.4M, which are larger than Piedmont Office Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $139.3M. Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M is lower than Piedmont Office Realty Trust's net income of -$11.5M. Notably, Hudson Pacific Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Piedmont Office Realty Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Pacific Properties is 0.47x versus 1.90x for Piedmont Office Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Service Properties Trust has a net margin of -47.54% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties's net margin of -9.55%. Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02% beat Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -21.72%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $6.08, signalling upside risk potential of 71.68%. On the other hand Service Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 90.57%. Given that Service Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Hudson Pacific Properties, analysts believe Service Properties Trust is more attractive than Hudson Pacific Properties.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.259% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Service Properties Trust has a beta of 2.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.105%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Service Properties Trust offers a yield of 25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hudson Pacific Properties pays -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Service Properties Trust pays out -404.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues are $200.4M, which are smaller than Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $491.2M. Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M is lower than Service Properties Trust's net income of -$46.9M. Notably, Hudson Pacific Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Service Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Pacific Properties is 0.47x versus 0.21x for Service Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.