MCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 15.09% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 7.16%. Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.32%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $223.18 which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Allstate.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 15.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.607%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Mercury General pays 73% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. Mercury General's net income of $230.9M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.76x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.69x versus 0.82x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First American Financial has a net margin of 15.09% compared to Mercury General's net margin of -7.4%. Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73% beat First American Financial's return on equity of 1.92%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.32%. On the other hand First American Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.62%. Given that First American Financial has higher upside potential than Mercury General, analysts believe First American Financial is more attractive than Mercury General.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 15.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First American Financial has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.572%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. First American Financial offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Mercury General pays 73% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial pays out 99.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than First American Financial quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Mercury General's net income of $230.9M is higher than First American Financial's net income of -$104M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.76x while First American Financial's PE ratio is 70.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.69x versus 1.12x for First American Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 15.09% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 10.59%. Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.32%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $264.72 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 15.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Mercury General pays 73% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Mercury General's net income of $230.9M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.76x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.69x versus 1.23x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 15.09% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 6.12%. Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.32%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.19%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than United Fire Group.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 15.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.168%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Mercury General pays 73% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $323M. Mercury General's net income of $230.9M is higher than United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.76x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 14.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.69x versus 0.61x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.