NMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 22.58% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 29.31%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.01%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.98%. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.47%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Mizuho Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Mizuho Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.599%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.72x versus 2.73x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 22.58% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 38.98%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.71%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.98%. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $10.37 which suggests that it could grow by 12.05%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than Nomura Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than Nomura Holdings.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.45%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $12.1B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $4.7B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.72x versus 3.12x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBI Holdings has a net margin of 22.58% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 6.47%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95% beat SBI Holdings's return on equity of 4.83%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.98%. On the other hand SBI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than SBI Holdings, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than SBI Holdings.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBI Holdings has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.011%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. SBI Holdings offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. SBI Holdings pays out 46.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than SBI Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M is higher than SBI Holdings's net income of $137.1M. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while SBI Holdings's PE ratio is 14.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.72x versus 0.97x for SBI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of 22.58% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 31.35%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.64%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.98%. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.05%. Given that Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has higher upside potential than Nomura Holdings, analysts believe Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group is more attractive than Nomura Holdings.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.144%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M is lower than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.72x versus 3.06x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.