NSA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 8.8% compared to National Storage Affiliates Trust's net margin of 31.6%. National Storage Affiliates Trust's return on equity of 5.9% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87%.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a consensus price target of $39.11, signalling upside risk potential of 13.26%. On the other hand Kimco Realty has an analysts' consensus of $24.60 which suggests that it could grow by 22.18%. Given that Kimco Realty has higher upside potential than National Storage Affiliates Trust, analysts believe Kimco Realty is more attractive than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.919%.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.55%. Kimco Realty offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays 172.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimco Realty pays out 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Storage Affiliates Trust quarterly revenues are $190.1M, which are smaller than Kimco Realty quarterly revenues of $525.4M. National Storage Affiliates Trust's net income of $16.7M is lower than Kimco Realty's net income of $166M. Notably, National Storage Affiliates Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.29x while Kimco Realty's PE ratio is 35.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Storage Affiliates Trust is 4.09x versus 6.64x for Kimco Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Realty Income has a net margin of 8.8% compared to National Storage Affiliates Trust's net margin of 14.89%. National Storage Affiliates Trust's return on equity of 5.9% beat Realty Income's return on equity of 2.28%.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a consensus price target of $39.11, signalling upside risk potential of 13.26%. On the other hand Realty Income has an analysts' consensus of $61.45 which suggests that it could grow by 11.28%. Given that National Storage Affiliates Trust has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe National Storage Affiliates Trust is more attractive than Realty Income.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Realty Income has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.247%.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.55%. Realty Income offers a yield of 5.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays 172.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Realty Income pays out 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Storage Affiliates Trust quarterly revenues are $190.1M, which are smaller than Realty Income quarterly revenues of $1.3B. National Storage Affiliates Trust's net income of $16.7M is lower than Realty Income's net income of $199.6M. Notably, National Storage Affiliates Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.29x while Realty Income's PE ratio is 56.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Storage Affiliates Trust is 4.09x versus 9.05x for Realty Income. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 8.8% compared to National Storage Affiliates Trust's net margin of 4.81%. National Storage Affiliates Trust's return on equity of 5.9% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a consensus price target of $39.11, signalling upside risk potential of 13.26%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 29.63%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than National Storage Affiliates Trust, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.55%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays 172.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but National Storage Affiliates Trust's is not.

National Storage Affiliates Trust quarterly revenues are $190.1M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. National Storage Affiliates Trust's net income of $16.7M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, National Storage Affiliates Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.29x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 18.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Storage Affiliates Trust is 4.09x versus 0.65x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veris Residential has a net margin of 8.8% compared to National Storage Affiliates Trust's net margin of -18.28%. National Storage Affiliates Trust's return on equity of 5.9% beat Veris Residential's return on equity of -1.82%.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a consensus price target of $39.11, signalling upside risk potential of 13.26%. On the other hand Veris Residential has an analysts' consensus of $19.79 which suggests that it could grow by 31.42%. Given that Veris Residential has higher upside potential than National Storage Affiliates Trust, analysts believe Veris Residential is more attractive than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.558% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veris Residential has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.04%.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.55%. Veris Residential offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays 172.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Veris Residential pays out -104.03% of its earnings as a dividend.

National Storage Affiliates Trust quarterly revenues are $190.1M, which are larger than Veris Residential quarterly revenues of $68.1M. National Storage Affiliates Trust's net income of $16.7M is higher than Veris Residential's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, National Storage Affiliates Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.29x while Veris Residential's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Storage Affiliates Trust is 4.09x versus 5.64x for Veris Residential. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.