OTIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The AZEK has a net margin of 15.22% compared to Otis Worldwide's net margin of 8.15%. Otis Worldwide's return on equity of -- beat The AZEK's return on equity of 11.1%.

Otis Worldwide has a consensus price target of $98.96, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand The AZEK has an analysts' consensus of $55.01 which suggests that it could grow by 12.3%. Given that The AZEK has higher upside potential than Otis Worldwide, analysts believe The AZEK is more attractive than Otis Worldwide.

Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The AZEK has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Otis Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. The AZEK offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Otis Worldwide pays 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. The AZEK pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otis Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than The AZEK quarterly revenues of $348.2M. Otis Worldwide's net income of $540M is higher than The AZEK's net income of $28.4M. Notably, Otis Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.33x while The AZEK's PE ratio is 47.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Otis Worldwide is 2.68x versus 5.01x for The AZEK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 15.22% compared to Otis Worldwide's net margin of 7.31%. Otis Worldwide's return on equity of -- beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.99%.

Otis Worldwide has a consensus price target of $98.96, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.93%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Otis Worldwide, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Otis Worldwide.

Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.259%.

Otis Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Otis Worldwide pays 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Otis Worldwide's net income of $540M is higher than EMCOR Group's net income of $270.3M. Notably, Otis Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.33x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 23.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Otis Worldwide is 2.68x versus 1.55x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fastenal has a net margin of 15.22% compared to Otis Worldwide's net margin of 15.61%. Otis Worldwide's return on equity of -- beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

Otis Worldwide has a consensus price target of $98.96, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $66.88 which suggests that it could grow by 1.19%. Given that Otis Worldwide has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Otis Worldwide is more attractive than Fastenal.

Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.399%.

Otis Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Otis Worldwide pays 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Otis Worldwide's net income of $540M is higher than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, Otis Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.33x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 37.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Otis Worldwide is 2.68x versus 5.74x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services has a net margin of 15.22% compared to Otis Worldwide's net margin of 4.52%. Otis Worldwide's return on equity of -- beat Quanta Services's return on equity of 12.54%.

Otis Worldwide has a consensus price target of $98.96, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand Quanta Services has an analysts' consensus of $333.37 which suggests that it could grow by 1.51%. Given that Otis Worldwide has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe Otis Worldwide is more attractive than Quanta Services.

Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.458%.

Otis Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Quanta Services offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Otis Worldwide pays 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Quanta Services quarterly revenues of $6.5B. Otis Worldwide's net income of $540M is higher than Quanta Services's net income of $293.2M. Notably, Otis Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.33x while Quanta Services's PE ratio is 60.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Otis Worldwide is 2.68x versus 2.15x for Quanta Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.