Financhill
Sell
28

PUMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$6.88
Seasonality move :
-10.53%
Day range:
$6.71 - $6.98
52-week range:
$6.54 - $11.17
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
26.47x
P/S ratio:
0.50x
P/B ratio:
0.87x
Volume:
1.3M
Avg. volume:
1.8M
1-year change:
-8.63%
Market cap:
$709.8M
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.34

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$357.4M $0.08 -16.59% -60.19% $10.63
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$539.8M -$0.13 -15.46% -45.87% $7.40
CLB
Core Laboratories
$130.2M $0.21 -3.51% 119.04% $18.50
KMI
Kinder Morgan
$3.7B $0.27 4.97% 8.79% $29.90
TRGP
Targa Resources
$4.9B $2.02 -3.08% 64.53% $216.07
USEG
US Energy
$4.5M -$0.08 -26.58% -89.74% $2.92
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$6.88 $10.63 $709.8M 26.47x $0.00 0% 0.50x
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$7.27 $7.40 $1.2B 8.77x $0.00 0% 0.53x
CLB
Core Laboratories
$15.23 $18.50 $713.2M 23.08x $0.01 0.26% 1.39x
KMI
Kinder Morgan
$27.10 $29.90 $60.2B 23.16x $0.29 4.24% 3.98x
TRGP
Targa Resources
$190.30 $216.07 $41.5B 33.03x $0.75 1.58% 2.57x
USEG
US Energy
$1.36 $2.92 $38M -- $0.02 0% 1.50x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
5.23% 0.474 4.68% 1.14x
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
52.41% 4.130 84.5% 0.52x
CLB
Core Laboratories
33.35% 2.404 15.45% 1.50x
KMI
Kinder Morgan
50.92% 0.827 50.91% 0.31x
TRGP
Targa Resources
84.26% 1.707 34.1% 0.56x
USEG
US Energy
-- 1.936 -- 0.28x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$29.4M $2.5M -14.22% -14.92% -5.78% $10M
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$3.8M -$44.2M -9.28% -17.93% -9.9% $13.3M
CLB
Core Laboratories
$19.4M $10.6M 7.99% 12.8% 10.97% $16.2M
KMI
Kinder Morgan
$2.2B $1.2B 4.11% 8.23% 29.7% $738M
TRGP
Targa Resources
$1.1B $700.5M 7.37% 29.27% 15.94% $601M
USEG
US Energy
-$476K -$2.4M -66.62% -75.29% -43.86% $333K

ProPetro Holding vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or ACDC?

    ProFrac Holding has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -23.09%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat ProFrac Holding's return on equity of -17.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    0.84% -$0.66 $2.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 54.43%. On the other hand ProFrac Holding has an analysts' consensus of $7.40 which suggests that it could grow by 1.79%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than ProFrac Holding, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than ProFrac Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    2 5 0
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    0 4 1
  • Is PUMP or ACDC More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProFrac Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProFrac Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProFrac Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are smaller than ProFrac Holding quarterly revenues of $454.7M. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is higher than ProFrac Holding's net income of -$105M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while ProFrac Holding's PE ratio is 8.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 0.53x for ProFrac Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    0.53x 8.77x $454.7M -$105M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or CLB?

    Core Laboratories has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 5.73%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 12.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    CLB
    Core Laboratories
    14.99% $0.15 $383.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or CLB?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 54.43%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Core Laboratories, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Core Laboratories.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    2 5 0
    CLB
    Core Laboratories
    0 4 0
  • Is PUMP or CLB More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 2.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.225%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or CLB?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or CLB?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $129.2M. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Core Laboratories's net income of $7.4M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 23.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 1.39x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    CLB
    Core Laboratories
    1.39x 23.08x $129.2M $7.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or KMI?

    Kinder Morgan has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 16.73%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    KMI
    Kinder Morgan
    53.98% $0.30 $63.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or KMI?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 54.43%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $29.90 which suggests that it could grow by 10.34%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    2 5 0
    KMI
    Kinder Morgan
    7 10 0
  • Is PUMP or KMI More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.412%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or KMI?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or KMI?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 3.98x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    KMI
    Kinder Morgan
    3.98x 23.16x $4B $667M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or TRGP?

    Targa Resources has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 7.97%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 29.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    TRGP
    Targa Resources
    25.07% $1.46 $18.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or TRGP?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 54.43%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $216.07 which suggests that it could grow by 13.54%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Targa Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    2 5 0
    TRGP
    Targa Resources
    14 2 0
  • Is PUMP or TRGP More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 2.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.004%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or TRGP?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 46.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or TRGP?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are smaller than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $4.4B. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Targa Resources's net income of $351M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 33.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 2.57x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    TRGP
    Targa Resources
    2.57x 33.03x $4.4B $351M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or USEG?

    US Energy has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -45.33%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat US Energy's return on equity of -75.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    9.16% -$0.17 $861.3M
    USEG
    US Energy
    -9.6% -$0.08 $35.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or USEG?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 54.43%. On the other hand US Energy has an analysts' consensus of $2.92 which suggests that it could grow by 114.46%. Given that US Energy has higher upside potential than ProPetro Holding, analysts believe US Energy is more attractive than ProPetro Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    2 5 0
    USEG
    US Energy
    1 0 0
  • Is PUMP or USEG More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Energy has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.014%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or USEG?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Energy pays out -3.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or USEG?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are larger than US Energy quarterly revenues of $5M. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than US Energy's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while US Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.50x versus 1.50x for US Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.50x 26.47x $320.6M -$17.1M
    USEG
    US Energy
    1.50x -- $5M -$2.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?
Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?

When the Federal Reserve started hiking rates in 2022, banks’…

Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?
Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?

Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) share price has been on the proverbial ropes…

Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?
Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?

Chip giant QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) was the ultimate chip company…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
59
GRRR alert for Mar 15

Gorilla Technology Group [GRRR] is up 29.72% over the past day.

Sell
49
SMTC alert for Mar 15

Semtech [SMTC] is up 21.28% over the past day.

Buy
62
PLPC alert for Mar 15

Preformed Line Products [PLPC] is up 17.38% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock