RYAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 2.91% compared to Ryan Specialty Holdings's net margin of 6.26%. Ryan Specialty Holdings's return on equity of 10.23% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 20.89%.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.08%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $292.28 which suggests that it could grow by 9%. Given that Ryan Specialty Holdings has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Ryan Specialty Holdings is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryan Specialty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryan Specialty Holdings quarterly revenues are $604.7M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ryan Specialty Holdings's net income of $17.6M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $75.5M. Notably, Ryan Specialty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.97x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 45.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryan Specialty Holdings is 6.31x versus 14.27x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Corebridge Financial has a net margin of 2.91% compared to Ryan Specialty Holdings's net margin of -58.44%. Ryan Specialty Holdings's return on equity of 10.23% beat Corebridge Financial's return on equity of -10.33%.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.08%. On the other hand Corebridge Financial has an analysts' consensus of $36.62 which suggests that it could grow by 22.99%. Given that Corebridge Financial has higher upside potential than Ryan Specialty Holdings, analysts believe Corebridge Financial is more attractive than Ryan Specialty Holdings.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corebridge Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Corebridge Financial offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Ryan Specialty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corebridge Financial pays out 155.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryan Specialty Holdings quarterly revenues are $604.7M, which are smaller than Corebridge Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Ryan Specialty Holdings's net income of $17.6M is higher than Corebridge Financial's net income of -$1.2B. Notably, Ryan Specialty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.97x while Corebridge Financial's PE ratio is 8.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryan Specialty Holdings is 6.31x versus 1.23x for Corebridge Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 2.91% compared to Ryan Specialty Holdings's net margin of 7.68%. Ryan Specialty Holdings's return on equity of 10.23% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.77%.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.08%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $195.80 which suggests that it could grow by 10.25%. Given that Ryan Specialty Holdings has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Ryan Specialty Holdings is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.846, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.42%.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ryan Specialty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 7% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryan Specialty Holdings quarterly revenues are $604.7M, which are smaller than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Ryan Specialty Holdings's net income of $17.6M is lower than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $184M. Notably, Ryan Specialty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.97x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 27.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryan Specialty Holdings is 6.31x versus 2.14x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 2.91% compared to Ryan Specialty Holdings's net margin of 0.44%. Ryan Specialty Holdings's return on equity of 10.23% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42%.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.08%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $54.86 which suggests that it could grow by 10.27%. Given that Ryan Specialty Holdings has higher upside potential than Trupanion, analysts believe Ryan Specialty Holdings is more attractive than Trupanion.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.454%.

Ryan Specialty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryan Specialty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryan Specialty Holdings quarterly revenues are $604.7M, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $327.5M. Ryan Specialty Holdings's net income of $17.6M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Ryan Specialty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.97x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryan Specialty Holdings is 6.31x versus 1.68x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.