TNL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Travel+Leisure's net margin of 16.92%. Travel+Leisure's return on equity of -- beat Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 93.73%.

Travel+Leisure has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.01%. On the other hand Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $30.60 which suggests that it could grow by 13.72%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Travel+Leisure, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Travel+Leisure.

Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 64.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 165.512%.

Travel+Leisure has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel+Leisure pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues are $993M, which are smaller than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Travel+Leisure's net income of $97M is lower than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of $474.9M. Notably, Travel+Leisure's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's PE ratio is 24.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel+Leisure is 0.95x versus 1.36x for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eightco Holdings has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Travel+Leisure's net margin of -41.41%. Travel+Leisure's return on equity of -- beat Eightco Holdings's return on equity of -52.91%.

Travel+Leisure has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.01%. On the other hand Eightco Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Travel+Leisure has higher upside potential than Eightco Holdings, analysts believe Travel+Leisure is more attractive than Eightco Holdings.

Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 64.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eightco Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Travel+Leisure has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Eightco Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel+Leisure pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Eightco Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues are $993M, which are larger than Eightco Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.7M. Travel+Leisure's net income of $97M is higher than Eightco Holdings's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Travel+Leisure's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while Eightco Holdings's PE ratio is 0.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel+Leisure is 0.95x versus 0.06x for Eightco Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ranpak Holdings has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Travel+Leisure's net margin of -8.79%. Travel+Leisure's return on equity of -- beat Ranpak Holdings's return on equity of -3.52%.

Travel+Leisure has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.01%. On the other hand Ranpak Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.17 which suggests that it could grow by 42.59%. Given that Ranpak Holdings has higher upside potential than Travel+Leisure, analysts believe Ranpak Holdings is more attractive than Travel+Leisure.

Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 64.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ranpak Holdings has a beta of 2.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.834%.

Travel+Leisure has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Ranpak Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel+Leisure pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Ranpak Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues are $993M, which are larger than Ranpak Holdings quarterly revenues of $92.2M. Travel+Leisure's net income of $97M is higher than Ranpak Holdings's net income of -$8.1M. Notably, Travel+Leisure's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while Ranpak Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel+Leisure is 0.95x versus 1.67x for Ranpak Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Travel+Leisure's net margin of 22.74%. Travel+Leisure's return on equity of -- beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.09%.

Travel+Leisure has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.01%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $247.66 which suggests that it could grow by 3.87%. Given that Travel+Leisure has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Travel+Leisure is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 64.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.928%.

Travel+Leisure has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Travel+Leisure pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues are $993M, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Travel+Leisure's net income of $97M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Travel+Leisure's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 24.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel+Leisure is 0.95x versus 4.11x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.