TWI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Titan International's net margin of -189.45%. Titan International's return on equity of -0.99% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.52%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Titan International has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 63.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.663%.

Titan International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Titan International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Titan International quarterly revenues are $383.6M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Titan International's net income of $1.3M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Titan International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.93x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan International is 0.27x versus 2.07x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Titan International's net margin of 10.52%. Titan International's return on equity of -0.99% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.52%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $489.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.33%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Deere &.

Titan International has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 63.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.33000000000001%.

Titan International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Titan International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Titan International quarterly revenues are $383.6M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Titan International's net income of $1.3M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Titan International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.93x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 20.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan International is 0.27x versus 2.67x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Titan International's net margin of 14.21%. Titan International's return on equity of -0.99% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69%.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.52%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $139.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.55%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Lindsay.

Titan International has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 63.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.23%.

Titan International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Titan International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Titan International quarterly revenues are $383.6M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $187.1M. Titan International's net income of $1.3M is lower than Lindsay's net income of $26.6M. Notably, Titan International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.93x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan International is 0.27x versus 2.12x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Titan International's net margin of -13.78%. Titan International's return on equity of -0.99% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.52%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $3.57 which suggests that it could grow by 650.88%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Titan International, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Titan International.

Titan International has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 63.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.174%.

Titan International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Titan International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Titan International quarterly revenues are $383.6M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Titan International's net income of $1.3M is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Titan International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.93x while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan International is 0.27x versus 0.10x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.