UMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of 21.37% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of -15.14%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -36.77%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.57, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.314%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. UMH Properties pays 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out 88.35% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UMH Properties's is not.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $60.7M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $1.8M. UMH Properties's net income of $13M is higher than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$276.4K. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 145.85x while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 47.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.72x versus 2.58x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Office Properties Income Trust has a net margin of 21.37% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of -48.43%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77% beat Office Properties Income Trust's return on equity of -1.92%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.57, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand Office Properties Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 226.73%. Given that Office Properties Income Trust has higher upside potential than UMH Properties, analysts believe Office Properties Income Trust is more attractive than UMH Properties.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Office Properties Income Trust has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.6%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Office Properties Income Trust offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. UMH Properties pays 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Office Properties Income Trust pays out -91.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $60.7M, which are smaller than Office Properties Income Trust quarterly revenues of $120.6M. UMH Properties's net income of $13M is higher than Office Properties Income Trust's net income of -$58.4M. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 145.85x while Office Properties Income Trust's PE ratio is 8.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.72x versus 0.10x for Office Properties Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power REIT has a net margin of 21.37% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of -22.79%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77% beat Power REIT's return on equity of -104.5%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.57, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand Power REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3392.06%. Given that Power REIT has higher upside potential than UMH Properties, analysts believe Power REIT is more attractive than UMH Properties.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power REIT has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.267%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Power REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UMH Properties pays 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Power REIT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $60.7M, which are larger than Power REIT quarterly revenues of $1.4M. UMH Properties's net income of $13M is higher than Power REIT's net income of -$325K. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 145.85x while Power REIT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.72x versus 1.35x for Power REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a net margin of 21.37% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of 28.02%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77% beat Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.57, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand Rexford Industrial Realty has an analysts' consensus of $49.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.01%. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than UMH Properties, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than UMH Properties.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.895%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Rexford Industrial Realty offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. UMH Properties pays 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Rexford Industrial Realty pays out 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $60.7M, which are smaller than Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues of $241.8M. UMH Properties's net income of $13M is lower than Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 145.85x while Rexford Industrial Realty's PE ratio is 31.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.72x versus 9.21x for Rexford Industrial Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.