VRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ideal Power has a net margin of 8.52% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of -485622.38%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 34.31% beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -59.68%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.07%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 103.49%. Given that Ideal Power has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Ideal Power is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.608, which suggesting that the stock is 60.825% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.376%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 2.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $550. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $176.6M is higher than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.49x while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 6.02x versus 360.79x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 8.52% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of -121.55%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 34.31% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -45.97%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.07%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 12.39%. Given that Vertiv Holdings has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Vertiv Holdings is more attractive than Plug Power.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.608, which suggesting that the stock is 60.825% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.272%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 2.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $173.7M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $176.6M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$211.2M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.49x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 6.02x versus 2.61x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thermon Group Holdings has a net margin of 8.52% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of 8.28%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 34.31% beat Thermon Group Holdings's return on equity of 9.34%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.07%. On the other hand Thermon Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.29%. Given that Thermon Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Thermon Group Holdings is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.608, which suggesting that the stock is 60.825% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thermon Group Holdings has a beta of 1.098, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.799%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Thermon Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 2.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Thermon Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Thermon Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $114.6M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $176.6M is higher than Thermon Group Holdings's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.49x while Thermon Group Holdings's PE ratio is 22.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 6.02x versus 1.97x for Thermon Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of 8.52% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of 0.72%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 34.31% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.07%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 94.18%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.608, which suggesting that the stock is 60.825% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.274%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 2.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $176.6M is higher than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.49x while Ultralife's PE ratio is 13.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 6.02x versus 0.73x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.