WSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bath & Body Works has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 16.25%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9% beat Bath & Body Works's return on equity of --.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $178.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Bath & Body Works has an analysts' consensus of $46.49 which suggests that it could grow by 53.54%. Given that Bath & Body Works has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Bath & Body Works is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, which suggesting that the stock is 82.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bath & Body Works has a beta of 1.896, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.642%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Bath & Body Works offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works pays out 22.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Bath & Body Works quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M is lower than Bath & Body Works's net income of $453M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.63x while Bath & Body Works's PE ratio is 8.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.72x versus 0.91x for Bath & Body Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 7.7%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $178.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $234.44 which suggests that it could grow by 19.95%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, which suggesting that the stock is 82.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.609%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M is higher than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.63x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 13.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.72x versus 1.21x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 13.48%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.46%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $178.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $100.10 which suggests that it could grow by 31.3%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, which suggesting that the stock is 82.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.791%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M is higher than Five Below's net income of $187.5M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.63x while Five Below's PE ratio is 16.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.72x versus 1.08x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RH has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 4.09%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9% beat RH's return on equity of --.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $178.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand RH has an analysts' consensus of $440.90 which suggests that it could grow by 82.06%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, which suggesting that the stock is 82.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RH has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.385%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. RH offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. RH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than RH quarterly revenues of $811.7M. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M is higher than RH's net income of $33.2M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.63x while RH's PE ratio is 69.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.72x versus 1.52x for RH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.