Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Buy
67
ANEW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$46.02
Seasonality move
:
0.7%
Day range:
$46.02 - $46.02
52-week range:
$37.10 - $47.40
Dividend yield:
1.06%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
124
Avg. volume:
272
1-year change:
21.24%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DVQQ
WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDIF
Fidelity Disruptors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MVPS
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
|
$46.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 1.06% | -- |
|
DVQQ
WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF
|
$24.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FDIF
Fidelity Disruptors ETF
|
$32.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.34% | -- |
|
MVPS
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
|
$24.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
|
$31.86 | -- | -- | -- | $1.56 | 5.49% | -- |
|
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF
|
$21.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.07% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
|
-- | 0.792 | -- | -- |
|
DVQQ
WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FDIF
Fidelity Disruptors ETF
|
-- | 0.644 | -- | -- |
|
MVPS
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
|
-- | 0.834 | -- | -- |
|
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
|
-- | 1.110 | -- | -- |
|
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DVQQ
WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDIF
Fidelity Disruptors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MVPS
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ANEW or DVQQ?
WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net margin of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's return on equity of -- beat WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- DVQQWEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANEW or DVQQ?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has higher upside potential than WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF, analysts believe ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is more attractive than WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF0 0 0 DVQQWEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF0 0 0 -
Is ANEW or DVQQ More Risky?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANEW or DVQQ?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANEW or DVQQ?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net income of -- is lower than WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is -- versus -- for WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- -- DVQQWEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANEW or FDIF?
Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net margin of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Disruptors ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- FDIFFidelity Disruptors ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANEW or FDIF?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Disruptors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Disruptors ETF, analysts believe ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Disruptors ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF0 0 0 FDIFFidelity Disruptors ETF0 0 0 -
Is ANEW or FDIF More Risky?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANEW or FDIF?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Fidelity Disruptors ETF offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Disruptors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANEW or FDIF?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Disruptors ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Disruptors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Disruptors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- -- FDIFFidelity Disruptors ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANEW or MVPS?
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net margin of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- MVPSAmplify Thematic All-Stars ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANEW or MVPS?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF, analysts believe ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is more attractive than Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF0 0 0 MVPSAmplify Thematic All-Stars ETF0 0 0 -
Is ANEW or MVPS More Risky?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANEW or MVPS?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANEW or MVPS?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- -- MVPSAmplify Thematic All-Stars ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANEW or NZUS?
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net margin of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- NZUSSPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANEW or NZUS?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF, analysts believe ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is more attractive than SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF0 0 0 NZUSSPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF0 0 0 -
Is ANEW or NZUS More Risky?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANEW or NZUS?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF offers a yield of 5.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANEW or NZUS?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- -- NZUSSPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANEW or QQQG?
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net margin of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- QQQGPacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANEW or QQQG?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF, analysts believe ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is more attractive than Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF0 0 0 QQQGPacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF0 0 0 -
Is ANEW or QQQG More Risky?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANEW or QQQG?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANEW or QQQG?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- -- QQQGPacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Ldrs ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 8.2% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 2.09% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 2.01% over the past day.
