Is It Time for Costco to Split?
Costco’s stock price has experienced enormous growth over the last…
Sell
20
CSHP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$100.30
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$100.28 - $100.30
52-week range:
$100.04 - $100.72
Dividend yield:
1.98%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
102
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AAA
Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUSI
American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
|
$100.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 1.98% | -- |
|
AAA
Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF
|
$25.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 6.17% | -- |
|
FUSI
American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
|
$50.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 5.98% | -- |
|
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
|
$99.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 4.93% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
AAA
Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF
|
-- | -0.003 | -- | -- |
|
FUSI
American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
|
-- | 0.078 | -- | -- |
|
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
|
-- | 0.103 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AAA
Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUSI
American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CSHP or AAA?
Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF-- -- -- AAAAlternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CSHP or AAA?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has higher upside potential than Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF, analysts believe iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF is more attractive than Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF0 0 0 AAAAlternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CSHP or AAA More Risky?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSHP or AAA?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF offers a yield of 6.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSHP or AAA?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF is -- versus -- for Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF-- -- -- -- AAAAlternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CSHP or FUSI?
American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF-- -- -- FUSIAmerican Century Multisector Floating Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CSHP or FUSI?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has higher upside potential than American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF, analysts believe iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF is more attractive than American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF0 0 0 FUSIAmerican Century Multisector Floating Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CSHP or FUSI More Risky?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSHP or FUSI?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF offers a yield of 5.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSHP or FUSI?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF is -- versus -- for American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF-- -- -- -- FUSIAmerican Century Multisector Floating Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CSHP or GBIL?
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF-- -- -- GBILGoldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CSHP or GBIL?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF, analysts believe iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF is more attractive than Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF0 0 0 GBILGoldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF0 0 0 -
Is CSHP or GBIL More Risky?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF has a beta of 0.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.87%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSHP or GBIL?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSHP or GBIL?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF is -- versus -- for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF-- -- -- -- GBILGoldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FedEx’s Spinoff Boost Its Stock Price?
In a pre-holiday surprise announcement, management at FedEx (NYSE:FDX) released…
Why Is Buffett Buying Verisign?
Warren Buffett has spent 2024 stockpiling cash, even going so…
Stock Ideas
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Sell
48
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
77
FTAI alert for Jan 1
FTAI Aviation [FTAI] is up 13.87% over the past day.
Buy
56
QMCO alert for Jan 1
Quantum [QMCO] is down 13.43% over the past day.
Buy
60
ARQQ alert for Jan 1
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is down 10.6% over the past day.
