Will This ETF Beat the Market Over the Next 12 Months?
2024 was another banner year for the US stock market,…
Sell
50
FLUD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.87
Seasonality move
:
-0.04%
Day range:
$24.86 - $24.89
52-week range:
$24.15 - $26.04
Dividend yield:
4.95%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.4K
Avg. volume:
1.7K
1-year change:
0.63%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PULT
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
$24.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 4.95% | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
$50.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 4.92% | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
$50.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 5.31% | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
$100.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 5.22% | -- |
|
PULT
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF
|
$50.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 5.38% | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
$75.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 5.34% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.032 | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.017 | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | 0.076 | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | 0.002 | -- | -- |
|
PULT
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF
|
-- | 0.052 | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | 0.035 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PULT
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUD or DUSB?
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLUD or DUSB?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLUD or DUSB More Risky?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUD or DUSB?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUD or DUSB?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUD or GSY?
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLUD or GSY?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF, analysts believe Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLUD or GSY More Risky?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has a beta of 0.111, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUD or GSY?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF offers a yield of 5.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUD or GSY?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUD or MINT?
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLUD or MINT?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr, analysts believe Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr0 0 0 -
Is FLUD or MINT More Risky?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has a beta of 0.100, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.977%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUD or MINT?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUD or MINT?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUD or PULT?
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- PULTPutnam ESG Ultra Short ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLUD or PULT?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF, analysts believe Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 PULTPutnam ESG Ultra Short ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLUD or PULT More Risky?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUD or PULT?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUD or PULT?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PULTPutnam ESG Ultra Short ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUD or RAVI?
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLUD or RAVI?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund, analysts believe Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is FLUD or RAVI More Risky?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has a beta of 0.090, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.963%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUD or RAVI?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund offers a yield of 5.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUD or RAVI?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Carlos Slim Buy PBF Energy?
Carlos Slim made a splash in a surprising sector last…
Is Booking Holdings Stock Undervalued?
There is a lot of humdrum in the market about…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 116x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Sell
47
DRUG alert for Jan 4
Bright Minds Biosciences [DRUG] is down 4.28% over the past day.
Buy
88
BMA alert for Jan 4
Banco Macro SA [BMA] is up 0.88% over the past day.
Sell
50
AGFY alert for Jan 4
Agrify [AGFY] is down 5.86% over the past day.
