KIE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is more attractive than First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.544%.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iShares US Insurance ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US Insurance ETF's return on equity of --.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US Insurance ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US Insurance ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is more attractive than iShares US Insurance ETF.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.850, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.003%.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. iShares US Insurance ETF offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US Insurance ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US Insurance ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US Insurance ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US Insurance ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US Insurance ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US Regional Banks ETF's return on equity of --.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US Regional Banks ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US Regional Banks ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is more attractive than iShares US Regional Banks ETF.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.561%.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. iShares US Regional Banks ETF offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US Regional Banks ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US Regional Banks ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US Regional Banks ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US Regional Banks ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF's return on equity of --.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.194%.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.