Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
34
LIT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$42.74
Seasonality move
:
-1.83%
Day range:
$42.12 - $42.76
52-week range:
$34.65 - $52.23
Dividend yield:
1.42%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
208K
Avg. volume:
343.5K
1-year change:
-14.93%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
$42.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 1.42% | -- |
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
$9.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 3.67% | -- |
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
$26.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 1.82% | -- |
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
$190.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.86 | 1.67% | -- |
|
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
|
$85.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 1.89% | -- |
|
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
|
$57.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.65% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.053 | -- | -- |
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | 1.110 | -- | -- |
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | 0.518 | -- | -- |
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | 1.220 | -- | -- |
|
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
|
-- | 1.131 | -- | -- |
|
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
|
-- | 1.039 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LIT or BATT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LIT or BATT?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is LIT or BATT More Risky?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.472%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or BATT?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or BATT?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -- BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LIT or ICOP?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LIT or ICOP?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF0 0 0 -
Is LIT or ICOP More Risky?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or ICOP?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or ICOP?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -- ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LIT or VAW?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LIT or VAW?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is LIT or VAW More Risky?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.239%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or VAW?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or VAW?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -- VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LIT or XLB?
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- XLBMaterials Select Sector SPDR Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LIT or XLB?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 XLBMaterials Select Sector SPDR Fund0 0 0 -
Is LIT or XLB More Risky?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has a beta of 1.098, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.849%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or XLB?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or XLB?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -- XLBMaterials Select Sector SPDR Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LIT or XME?
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- XMESPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LIT or XME?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 XMESPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF0 0 0 -
Is LIT or XME More Risky?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.299%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or XME?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or XME?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -- XMESPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
